Gold has staged a sharp rebound as Middle East tensions ease, with falling energy prices and softer financial conditions supporting bullion’s recovery from recent lows.
After signing off on its worst month since October 2008 – a brutal stretch that saw the precious metal finish 11.57% lower – gold has extended its Lazarus‑like recovery, climbing back above the $4700 level earlier in today’s session. At an intraday high of $4723, bullion has rebounded an impressive $625, or 15.2%, from the $4098 low struck just nine days ago.
This rebound has gathered momentum as rising hopes of de‑escalation in the Iran conflict improve the broader macro backdrop. A softer US dollar, falling treasury yields and declining energy prices have combined to provide a supportive tailwind for the yellow metal.
President Trump’s latest comments on ending the conflict appear to be his most definitive yet. He noted the US would be leaving Iran ‘very soon’, with the White House flagging an ‘important announcement’ scheduled for Wednesday at 9.00pm EDT (Thursday at 12.00 AEDT).
As outlined in yesterday’s crude oil update here, these de‑escalation signals arrive as President Trump faces falling approval ratings, linked directly to US retail petrol prices pushing above $4 a gallon – a challenging political backdrop ahead of the November midterms.
The administration now appears to face a binary choice: attempt to forcibly reopen the Strait of Hormuz, risking US servicemen’s lives and significant damage to global energy infrastructure, or pursue a rapid resolution. The latter would leave the current regime in place, limit infrastructure damage and potentially allow oil prices to stabilise or fall if Iran reopens the Strait once US forces withdraw.
As a side note, while a swift exit would likely be framed as a victory domestically and welcomed by financial markets, it remains unclear how US allies in the Gulf – who would be left highly exposed – would respond to what could be viewed as a tactical retreat.
Returning to gold, an end to the conflict could prove a double‑edged sword. On one hand, a lasting peace agreement would remove the geopolitical safe‑haven bid that supported prices in the lead‑up to the conflict.
On the other hand, lower oil prices and easing inflation pressures would likely revive expectations for Federal Reserve (Fed) rate cuts later in 2026. When combined with ongoing structural demand from central banks, which continue to accumulate gold for diversification, the longer‑term upside case remains intact.
Given these competing cross‑currents – the loss of an immediate safe‑haven premium offset by renewed rate‑cut expectations and persistent central bank buying – prices are more likely to grind higher rather than stage a rapid rally from here.
After maintaining a bearish stance on gold through much of March – a view reinforced by its decisive break below $5000 – we shifted to a bullish bias early last week. This change followed gold’s successful test and rebound from our key $4200 – $4100 support zone.
Provided gold continues to hold above this critical support band at $4130 – $4100, we expect prices to grind higher, initially targeting a move back towards the $5000 level. A decisive break above $5000 would then open the door to a potential retest of the $5602 record high.
This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Australia Pty Ltd. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients.