Skip to content

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved.

Novo vs Lilly: the weight-loss drug war—and how to trade the outcome

It started as a weight-loss breakthrough. Now it’s a market bloodbath. CEO ousted, stocks crashing and rivals circling.
The Ozempic saga is far from over.

Novo Nordisk logo Source: Adobe images
Novo Nordisk logo Source: Adobe images

This article was produced by IG's editorial team using AI-enhanced research tools

From diabetes drug to Wall Street darling

Ozempic is not just changing waistlines – it's changing markets. Originally developed as a treatment for Type 2 diabetes, the drug quickly rose to prominence as a revolutionary weight-loss solution, capturing the imagination of consumers, celebrities and investors alike.

Behind its ascent lies a fierce rivalry between two pharmaceutical giants: Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. Their race to dominate the obesity drug market has generated record-breaking profits, intense investor scrutiny and, most recently, a stunning CEO exit that shook Wall Street.

Ozempic and Wegovy Source: Adobe images

The rise of Ozempic

Market disruption

Ozempic, powered by the active ingredient semaglutide, received FDA approval in 2021. What set it apart wasn't just its efficacy in managing blood sugar but its dramatic weight-loss side effect. That unintended benefit turned the drug into a cultural and commercial juggernaut. With endorsements from celebrities like Oprah Winfrey and Amy Schumer, Ozempic became a household name, frequently trending on social media and sparking debate about the ethics of off-label use and body image culture.

Sales success

The hype translated into real profits. In 2024 alone, Novo Nordisk reported a 26% increase in Ozempic sales, reaching DKK 120.3 billion. Its market penetration was equally impressive: anti-obesity medications are now prescribed to an estimated 6% of Americans, with prescriptions doubling annually since 2019. Novo's soaring valuation surpassed US$500 billion, placing it among the world's most valuable companies.

Quick fact

Market valuation milestones for Novo Nordisk

  • 2019: Market valuation around $150 billion (approximate based on sales and market trends)

  • 2022: Market value surpassed $300 billion amid Ozempic and Wegovy success

  • 2024: Market valuation exceeded $500 billion, making Novo one of Europe’s most valuable companies

The competitive edge: Novo vs Lilly

Novo Nordisk's strategy

Novo Nordisk built its dominance on a strong GLP-1 drug portfolio, including Wegovy and Saxenda. Its strategic roadmap featured next-gen therapies like CagriSema, which combines semaglutide and cagrilintide to deliver even more powerful appetite suppression. However, despite its early lead, Novo struggled with supply shortages and increased scrutiny over off-label use, threatening to erode its competitive advantage.

Eli Lilly's counterattack

Eli Lilly aggressively countered with tirzepatide, marketed as Mounjaro for diabetes and Zepbound for obesity. Unlike Ozempic, which targets only the GLP-1 receptor, tirzepatide hits both GLP-1 and GIP receptors, offering even greater weight-loss potential. Clinical trials have shown Zepbound can help users lose up to 25% of their body weight, eclipsing Ozempic's results. By early 2025, Zepbound overtook Wegovy in US prescription volume, cementing Lilly's growing lead.

Average weight loss in trials: Zepbound vs Wegovy

Weight Loss Comparison

Investor expectations vs reality

High hopes and harsh realities

Investors once viewed Novo Nordisk as an unstoppable force. In early 2025, the company beat earnings expectations with adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.99 and revenue of $11.87 billion. But cracks began to show. The company downgraded its full-year sales guidance due to slower uptake of Wegovy in the US., partially driven by the emergence of cheaper, compounded semaglutide alternatives. Clinical trials for CagriSema also underwhelmed, delivering 23% weight loss against a 25% target in December 2024 and only 13.7% in follow-ups.

CEO's departure

In a move that stunned the market, Novo Nordisk's CEO Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen was forced to step down in May 2025. Despite his role in tripling the company's market value, Jorgensen paid the price for missing the mark on innovation and execution. This marked the first CEO exit at Novo since 1960, signaling a dramatic shift in leadership driven by mounting investor pressure.

Novo Nordisk's CEO Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen before his forced departure 

Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen Source: Bloomberg images
Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen Source: Bloomberg images

Market reactions and trading prospects

Stock market volatility

The fallout was swift. Novo Nordisk's share price plunged over 55% from mid-2024 to mid-2025. Meanwhile, Eli Lilly saw its market cap surge, driven by Zepbound's superior efficacy and rapid uptake. The contrasting performance between the two giants reflects shifting investor sentiment and the immense stakes involved in the obesity drug market.

Client sentiment indicators

Current IG client sentiment data reveals an intriguing disconnect in the weight-loss drug sector. While 97% of traders hold long positions on Novo Nordisk, recent trading activity shows 100% sells today and approximately 60% sells over the past month. This paradoxical positioning - overwhelmingly bullish sentiment paired with consistent selling pressure - may indicate profit-taking from early investors or growing skepticism about Novo's ability to regain market leadership. With 51-250 active clients trading this market, this positioning disparity could signal an upcoming sentiment shift worth monitoring.

Trading strategies

This market turbulence presents unique opportunities for traders. Short-term volatility around clinical trials, FDA approvals and quarterly earnings can create actionable entry and exit points. Traders may also consider:

  • Event-driven trading: position around drug launches and earnings surprises
  • Contrarian approaches: the current bullish positioning despite selling pressure may present opportunities for those willing to challenge prevailing sentiment
  • Hedging: long Lilly/short Novo pairs trading strategies
  • Thematic investing: broader exposure through healthcare and biotech ETFs like XLV or IBB
  • Momentum tracking: monitor shifts in client sentiment as leading indicators of potential price reversals

IG clientsentiment for Novo Nordisk

IG clientsentiment 210525 Source: IG
IG clientsentiment 210525 Source: IG

Why this is just the beginning

The pipeline battle is far from over. Novo Nordisk is betting on CagriSema and next-generation amycretin-based therapies, which target multiple gut hormones to amplify weight-loss effects. Meanwhile, Eli Lilly is advancing pill-based GLP-1s and exploring new indications for tirzepatide.

The rise of GLP-1 drugs is reshaping the pharmaceutical landscape. Analysts forecast the obesity drug market could exceed $100 billion, with ripple effects across food, wellness, insurance and public health. Yet ethical concerns about access, pricing and long-term safety persist, adding complexity to this rapidly evolving sector.

The Ozempic saga is a vivid reminder that medical breakthroughs can upend entire industries—and investor expectations along with them. With Novo and Lilly battling for dominance, traders have an unprecedented opportunity to engage with a dynamic, high-growth sector.

Source: Adobe images
Source: Adobe images

     

Important to know

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Australia Pty Ltd. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients.