Whilst most traders focus on the day-to-day price movements of blockchain cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin and ether, there’s no denying that opinions on blockchain technology are mixed. But that’s a whole different debate, for a different day. Instead we are going to assume Blyth Masters, former head of global commodities at JP Morgan Chase, is right.
'How seriously should you take this? I would take it about as seriously as you should have taken the concept of the internet in the early 1990’s. It’s a big deal. And it is going to change the way our financial world operates.'
With that in mind, let’s review some core areas where blockchain technology could affect the financial sector.
Cutting out the middle man
A key advantage to blockchain technology is cutting out the middle man. In effect, because all transactions on a blockchain are validated by the community based on a mathematical probability, the requirement of a trusted intermediary is unnecessary. Blockchain would allow you to have a decentralised stock exchange, without the need for a brokerage, clearing house, or settlement process. Everyone would transact directly on the decentralised exchange, and the code itself would be sufficient to provide the services that are currently provided by the broker. However, without an intermediary, how would this transfer of assets work in practice?
Let’s take an example where a specific trade goes through at a specific price. Effectively, thousands of those within the community vote on the validity of that transaction, and because it’s in the individual voter’s interest to tell the truth, the community as a whole can validate if that trade went through at that price. No middleman. No trusted third party.
This makes operational costs lower, and reduces risk. Costs are reduced because there is no central party, and in theory, the deal is safer because there isn’t a central trusted authority who could either be hacked or act immorally. The trade can only be validated if it objectively takes place, and there is no requirement to maintain a duplicate reconciliation of ledgers, checks and balances.
Speeding up settlement and clearing
Cutting out middle and back office job roles is also likely to not only affect costs and reduce risk, but also speed up settlement. This would apply not only to things like contract and stock settlement, but also FX settlement. Imagine a world where stocks and FX don’t take two and three days to settle, and transfers between brokerages (or directly between two individuals as discussed above) are processed within minutes rather than weeks. This is the outcome which advocates of blockchain are aiming for.
Instantaneous settlement would also have an effect on liquidity, not only for equities, but basic monetary movements (not just FX dealing). You’d be able to make a payment to a friend or institution over the weekend, and have the payment settle almost instantly, rather than waiting the 3 days plus which is currently required in clearing. Bills could be paid immediately, and there could, in theory, be no cross-boarder friction like there currently is. Although we have the euro, USD, sterling, and Japanese yen as supposedly ‘international currencies’, we’ve never had a truly global monetary system. FX conversion costs would go out the window, and the frictionless movement of money could actually become a reality.