David Jones discounts to middle ground

On first blush the DJS results appear mild; the truth is though they are probably strong, considering market conditions.

The net profit figure of A$101.6 million excluding the A$9.1 million transaction charge for Dick Smith was well above estimates of $98 million. Stripping the Dick Smith transaction out, the figure drops to $95.2 million which is a fall year-on-year by 6.3%. However, DJS believes the new strategy around Dick Smith will see this charge recuperated over the coming financial year as it looks to revitalise this lacking category.

Revenues declined 1.2% year-on-year to $1.85 billion, which is also a slight miss on estimates, while like-for-like sales dropped 1.8% which management blames on sentiments. The revenue numbers are moderate considering the retail climate of the last six months and could be met with slight optimism.

What will please investors is gross profit margins jumped 80 basis points to 38.3%. However that is well short of the margins extracted by nearest rival Myer (MYR) which saw gross profit margins up 40 basis points to 41.7%.

This shows that in the current climate competition is still rife. DJS numbers appear to have been reached on quantity even though the company has reduced the metrics of sales events to ‘reflect a more appropriate mix full price and discount events’. That does explain the gross margin growth however the fact it is still low compared to its competitors and historical numbers suggests discount turnover is well and truly outstripping normal trading. This again gets back to current retail sentiments.

The final dividend of seven cents is a slight beat on estimates of six and a half cents which will add a little candy for income investors.

In terms of forward guidance, DJS as with MYR has not provided any specific FY14 guidance except to state the obvious that ‘challenging trading conditions will remain’. Every single retailer this financial year has used this line; Solomon Lew owner of Premier investments went one step further at PMV’s results, stating that retail companies need the RBA to step in even more than it has and cut rates almost to the bone, so as to improve sentiment and consumer spending.

Although Paul Zahra hasn’t gone as far as Mr Lew or MYR CEO Bernie Brooks, there is no doubt DJS would benefit from a lower AUD, stronger consumer confidence and increased retail spend. The FY13 result is solid considering the conditions and will see the share price bounce as DJS is still trailing MYR on a stock price comparison, but it must be noted that on fundamental retail in general it still looks constrained.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 79% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.