Skip to content

Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Aramco IPO – London or New York?

London and New York are locked in a battle to win the key IPO of Saudi Aramco, with huge rewards on offer for the winner.

Wall Street
Source: Bloomberg

The flotation of Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil firm, Saudi Aramco, has fixated investors for months now. It represents, potentially, the world’s richest initial public offering (IPO), and would be a major coup for one of the significant global finance hubs. The Saudi government plans to list in Riyadh, but sell shares on another exchange, in a process called a ‘secondary listing.’

While the likes of Tokyo and Hong Kong could be in the running, in reality the only two choices are London and New York. London, of course, has Brexit uncertainty hanging over it, but its appeal was recently enhanced with a $2 billion loan guarantee.

The regulator in London has recently proposed a change to the rules surrounding new listings, and this would make it possible for Aramco to trade on the premium segment, which gives a broader range of investors rather than its standard version. In addition, it would end the rule that requires sovereign-backed firms to list at least 25% of its shares. Aramco only plans to list around 5% of the company, so if this rule remains in place then it would have to remain in the standard segment.

Instead, New York may take the prize. Arguably it is still the global financial hub, despite London’s huge appeal. President Trump already has a rapport with the Saudi crown prince, who has recently been engaged in a power grab that has seen large number of royal family members and officials arrested. Aramco is one of the largest crude suppliers to the US, although the rise of shale gas and the cutbacks to the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) production has diminished this so some extent. It also owns a refinery in Texas, which is the largest in the US.

For the US, the biggest risk is litigation. US laws allow terrorism victims to sue foreign governments that have been linked to attacks. The 9/11 attackers were Saudi citizens, and the possibility of court action diminishes New York’s appeal.

Overall, both London and New York have major appeal. In the final analysis, political considerations (and the need to maintain the close relationship between Riyadh and Washington) may trump London’s appeal. For whichever major financial hub wins the prize, the rewards could be significant, as liquidity increases, and other firms follow Aramco’s lead. 

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by writer