Skip to content

Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 68% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 68% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Bitcoin rout: where to next?

Bitcoin has experienced significant volatility in early 2026, with sharp declines testing major support levels and challenging its store-of-value narrative.

Close up image of a gold bitcoin standing up on it's side atop a light brown wooden surface. Source: Bloomberg

Written by

Axel Rudolph FSTA

Axel Rudolph FSTA

Senior Technical Analyst

Publication date

Bitcoin falls out of bed but nears major support

​Since the beginning of 2026, Bitcoin has faced intensified volatility, with a sharp sell-off underscoring how even the largest and most liquid cryptocurrency remains highly sensitive to macroeconomic pressures, leveraged positioning and shifts in investor sentiment.

​Long-term narrative versus short-term price action

​While Bitcoin’s longer-term narrative - as a store of value and a potential hedge against monetary debasement - continues to anchor many holders, recent price action has been dominated by short-term forces that have amplified downside risk and exposed the fragility of market conviction during risk-off episodes.

​In the early weeks of the year, Bitcoin showed signs of tentative resilience. Following a recovery from late-2025 weakness, it traded in a choppy but broadly stable range, supported by optimism around improving regulatory clarity, ongoing institutional access via spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and the sense that much of the forced deleveraging from last year had already been absorbed. That stability, however, masked vulnerabilities that became clearer once broader financial conditions tightened.

​Risk-off sentiment triggers de-risking

​The catalyst for the recent decline has been a renewed wave of broad-based de-risking across cryptocurrencies, and Bitcoin - despite its reputation as the “blue chip” of crypto - was once again treated as a high-liquidity risk asset rather than a defensive allocation.

​Market structure amplifies volatility

​Positioning and market structure amplified the move. A wave of spot ETF redemptions, forced liquidations in derivatives markets and stop-loss cascades combined to accelerate the sell-off. As prices broke below key technical levels, the mechanical unwinding of leveraged long positions pushed Bitcoin lower at a pace that spot selling alone would likely not have produced, reinforcing the sense of disorder and fragility across digital assets.

​Narrative challenges mount

​This episode has also challenged several of Bitcoin’s most widely repeated narratives. Bitcoin has not consistently behaved as an inflation hedge, failing to rally in a reliable way during inflation-driven macro stress. It has not acted as a stable haven during geopolitical tension, often falling alongside equities when risk appetite deteriorates. And it has increasingly lost traction as a pure momentum trade, with rallies struggling to sustain follow-through once liquidity tightens and volatility rises.

​That narrative breakdown matters because Bitcoin remains the benchmark asset for the entire crypto market. When Bitcoin fails to behave like a hedge, a haven, or a trend asset, confidence erodes more broadly, and selling pressure tends to spread quickly as investors reassess what role crypto is actually playing in portfolios.

​Rather than acting as a stabiliser, Bitcoin has become the transmission mechanism through which macro shocks, liquidity stress and positioning imbalances ripple through the digital asset complex.

​Institutional versus retail dynamics

​The Bitcoin market comprises both institutional investors and retail traders with different behaviours and motivations.

​Institutional participants tend towards longer-term positioning whilst retail often trades more actively.

​Institutional adoption through ETFs, corporate treasury holdings and investment fund allocations has grown substantially. However, this participation hasn't eliminated volatility as initially hoped.

​Retail investor sentiment measured through social media and trading app data shows reduced conviction. Note that retail enthusiasm often marks market tops whilst capitulation signals potential bottoms.

​The balance between institutional accumulation and retail selling determines near-term price direction. Currently, both groups appear reducing exposure rather than buying dips.

​Comparison with previous Bitcoin cycles

​Bitcoin has experienced multiple boom-bust cycles throughout its history. Each cycle exhibits unique characteristics whilst sharing common patterns including leverage buildups and liquidations.

​The 2017 - 2018 cycle saw Bitcoin reach nearly $20,000 before collapsing to $3,000. The 2021 peak around $69,000 was followed by decline to $16,000 in late 2022.

​Current institutional participation exceeds previous cycles through regulated products and corporate adoption. However, this hasn't prevented significant drawdowns.

​Understanding historical cycles provides context but doesn't guarantee future patterns repeat.

​Important technical levels to watch

​Bitcoin’s slice through the key $73,581.22 - $70,040.75 support zone has taken it very close to the minor psychological $60,000 mark, a level last traded in October 2024.

​Below it lies another significant support zone at $59,635.83 - $56,148.93 which consists of several of the weekly lows seen between March and September 2024.

​Bitcoin weekly candlestick chart 

Bitcoin weekly candlestick chart Source: TradingView
Bitcoin weekly candlestick chart Source: TradingView

​While Bitcoin remains above the $60,000 mark on a daily chart closing basis, though, a recovery towards the $70,040.75 - $73,581.22 resistance area may ensue. This may then cap the cryptocurrency for several days.

​Bitcoin daily candlestick chart 

Bitcoin daily candlestick chart Source: TradingView
Bitcoin daily candlestick chart Source: TradingView

​A rise and weekly chart close above the $70,040.75 - $73,581.22 resistance zone, were it to happen, would be technically more constructive.

​What's ahead for Bitcoin

​Looking ahead, Bitcoin’s near-term direction will likely depend on whether ETF flows return to net accumulation, and whether leverage can be rebuilt in a healthier way without immediately triggering renewed liquidation risk.

​For now, the current sharp sell-off serves as a reminder that even Bitcoin - despite its maturity, institutional footprint and deep liquidity - remains vulnerable to the same forces that drive other risk assets: tightening financial conditions, sudden shifts in sentiment, and the rapid unwinding of crowded positioning.​​

Important to know

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.