​​Markets navigate geopolitical tensions and central bank uncertainty​

​​​Middle East conflict drives market caution - but is it justified?

​Global markets are walking on eggshells as the Israel-Iran conflict enters its sixth day, but frankly, the reaction feels somewhat overblown. Yes, tensions are escalating, but markets have seen this playbook before and survived far worse geopolitical storms.

​President Trump's bombastic call for Iran's "unconditional surrender" is classic Trump rhetoric - designed more for domestic consumption than actual policy. Seasoned traders know to separate the noise from the signal, and right now there's plenty of noise.

​The rush to safe-haven assets has been predictable but not particularly dramatic. The US dollar's strength is more about relative weakness elsewhere than genuine panic buying, whilst European equities' flat performance suggests investors are waiting rather than fleeing.

​This cautious positioning ahead of the Federal Reserve (Fed) decision makes sense, but the geopolitical premium being applied to risk assets looks overdone. Smart money will likely start buying these dips if tensions don't escalate materially.

​Oil's war premium looks about right - for now

​Oil trading markets have handled this crisis with surprising maturity. Brent crude oil at $76.10 with analysts pricing in a $5.00-$10.00 war premium feels reasonable, perhaps even conservative given the stakes.

​The key insight here is OPEC+'s substantial spare capacity - roughly 6 million barrels per day that could flood markets if needed. This safety net means current prices probably represent fair value rather than panic buying.

​However, the Strait of Hormuz remains the ultimate wild card. Should Iran threaten this critical chokepoint, that modest war premium could triple overnight. Commodity trading veterans know that oil spikes hard and fast when supply routes get threatened.

​The smart play here is watching for any signs of Iran targeting shipping lanes. That's when oil moves from a geopolitical sideshow to the main event.

​Fed faces an impossible balancing act

​The Fed walks into today's meeting with an enviable problem - markets expect nothing, which gives them maximum flexibility. But that 0.9% retail sales crash changes everything, and Jerome Powell knows it.

​This isn't just a soft patch - it's the canary in the coal mine for consumer resilience. When Americans stop spending this aggressively, the Fed's inflation fight becomes secondary to preventing recession fears from becoming reality.

​The updated dot plot will be fascinating because it has to reconcile hawkish inflation concerns with increasingly dovish growth data. Gold trading at $3,386.00 suggests markets are positioning for a more dovish Fed than the rhetoric suggests.

​Powell's challenge is maintaining credibility on inflation whilst acknowledging the economic data is clearly softening. Expect dovish undertones wrapped in hawkish language - classic Fed-speak.

​UK inflation data exposes BoE's growing dilemma

​The Bank of England (BoE) must be pulling its hair out over this inflation data. Headline numbers dropping to 3.4% should be good news, but that 4.4% food price surge tells a completely different story about underlying pressures.

​Services inflation stuck at 4.7% is the real problem here - it shows domestic price pressures remain entrenched despite all the economic headwinds. This isn't transitory anymore; it's structural, and the BoE knows it.

​The central bank faces an impossible choice: cut rates to support growth and risk reigniting inflation, or hold firm and watch the economy weaken further. Neither option looks particularly appealing right now.

​Market expectations for rate cuts later this year look increasingly optimistic given these numbers. The BoE will probably have to choose between economic growth and inflation credibility - and recent history suggests they'll choose credibility every time.

The material does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. The research does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it.

It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. We aim to establish and maintain and operate effective organisational and administrative arrangements with a view to taking all reasonable steps to prevent conflicts of interest from constituting or giving rise to a material risk of damage to the interests of our clients. We operate a policy of independence which requires our employees to act in our clients’ best interests and to disregard any conflicts of interests in providing our services. Furthermore, IG does not seek to disclose the relevant information to any issuer discussed prior to dissemination. The organisational and administrative controls mentioned herein are set out in our Conflicts Policy, a summary of which (our Summary Conflicts Policy) is available on our website.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Ltd. Registered Office: Cannon Bridge House, 25 Dowgate Hill, London, EC4R 2YA. IG Markets Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales under number 04008957. We are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Register Number 195355).