CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 70% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.

Trader thoughts - the long and short of it

Just when it looked like it was safe to jump back into financial markets, it was risk-off again overnight, as market participants dwelled once more on the myriad of risks facing them.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk-off (again): There’s nothing entirely new in what has developed during the European and North American session: the same confluence of factors that has weighed on sentiment in markets have simply reared their head again. It’s probably what makes this situation all the graver, if not at the very least, highly gnawing. The anxiety riddling markets regarding the impacts of trade-protectionism, and the beginning of the end of the easy money era, can’t seem to be rationalized, inflating the magnitude of that issue – apparently inexorably. Fear is feeding on fear, making markets more attuned to the roar of the bears.

Haven buying: As has been the case throughout the turbulent journey markets have traversed in the last week, it pays not to catastrophize; but the longer the weak sentiment lasts the more difficult it will probably prove to shake. As a trader, no matter the weather, opportunities abound for those willing to tackle them. It was havens again that attracted a bid higher last night, with gold (as old-reliable) catching the upswing. Carry trades were broadly unwound and kicked-down the likes of the AUD/USD to the 0.7100 handle, a dynamic causing the Japanese Yen to tick higher. 10 Year US Treasury yields maintained the line at 3.17%, amid opposing pressure of haven buying and the carry-through of higher rate expectations, bringing the USD back into haven-vogue.

Europe: European economics and geo-politics threw up some more major worries overnight, drawn out from the EU economic summit in Brussels. Markets over the extent of the week have priced-out an imminent Brexit resolution, pushing the Pound further into 1.30 handle and the Euro into the 1.14 handle. The greatest risk being priced in by markets however is renewed concern regarding Italy’s fiscal position – and Rome’s perceived belligerence towards Brussels’ bureaucrats. The EU slapped down Rome’s budgetary position, effectively labelling it untenable for both that country and the Union. European sovereign bond spreads widened more so in the last 24 hours, the greatest impact naturally being found in the spread between German Bunds and Italian BTPS, which expanded to almost 330 basis points – the widest margin since 2013.

Global equities: The day on Wall Street, backing that up of Europe’s, has been a difficult one for investors, unaided by a session (of what’s being judged) of soft earnings reports. Two days of lukewarm company reports shouldn’t shift the dial of equity markets, but the hope that strong corporate profits would be the saviour from otherwise dour sentiment hasn’t yet eventuated. It’s forced market-bulls to doubt their conviction and fed the bears greater fodder to sell stocks. Consistent with recent themes, US big-tech and the Nasdaq (down 2.08%) have generally led the sell-off on Wall Street over reluctance to go long growth companies, punctuating the shaky European session where the likes of the FTSE100 dipped 0.39%, and the DAX shed 0.97% – the latter in part due to a poor earnings report from market giant SAP.

ASX yesterday: The lead garnered last night augurs poorly for the ASX 200, reflected in an expected 66-point drop for the index according to SPI futures. The shame is that some semblance (or as close as can be found in these circumstances) of equilibrium appeared to return the Australian market yesterday. The tone throughout Asia trade, notwithstanding the struggles of Chinese markets, improved throughout the session, supported perhaps by the reported drop in the domestic unemployment rate, pushing the tepid Wall Street lead aside and allowing the index to recover early losses to close trade effectively flat for the day. Volume thinned as the session wore on to be sure, but breadth recovered to just shy of 50%, revealing a willingness in market participants to acquire and spread some exposure across Aussie equities.

ASX today: For all the contentment that yesterday engendered, in means little in the face of another day of likely heavy losses. The call in these instances is to assume the ASX 200's (modestly sized) tech space, along with the health care sector, will lead losses. In saying that, the selling today risks being rather broad based, with a sell-off in oil prices and a wider dip in commodity prices a potential drag on the energy and materials sectors. The risks abound at this stage, but the major flashpoint will probably come mid-day when a massive data dump, containing GDP data, Fixed Asset Investment numbers and more, is released out of China. It provides a potential queue for investors to form a judgement on the Chinese growth story, and may prove to exacerbate or soothe investors’ fears regarding global growth.

China: The bearishness in China is possibly the severest predicament of all – one that can only become worse today given the sweeping of bearishness through global equity markets. Depending on the index, Chinese equities have tumbled now by 30% off this year’s highs, further entrenching a technical bear market. China’s equities overall look very oversold, with average PE ratios on the blue-chip heavy CSI300 circa 10:1, and presenting on the technicals just above an absolutely oversold reading. Simply, China’s equities can’t find a buyer, fundamentally due to potential fall-out of the US-China trade war. Undoubtedly, there are more complex and murky issues going on under the bonnet of the Chinese economic vehicle – the seemingly controlled devaluation of the Yuan by the PBOC apparently one – but a sell-off like this in spite of not that bad fundamentals suggests that investors can’t move passed the unknown whipped up the unfolding US-China trade war.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by writer

  • Aaran Fronda
    London
  • Andreas Ruhlmann
    Ginevra
  • Angela Teng
    Singapore
  • Anzél Killian
    Johannesburg
  • Barbara Vacher
    Paris
  • Becca Cattlin
    London
  • Ben Kelly
    London
  • Callum Cliffe
    London
  • Chris Beauchamp
    London
  • Christopher Vecchio
    New York City
  • Christos Maloussis
    Ginevra
  • Claire Williamson
    Johannesburg
  • Daniel Dubrovsky
    San Francisco
  • Daniel Smyth
    London
  • Daniela Sabin Hathorn
    London
  • David Song
    New York City
  • Elizabeth Díaz Zúñiga
    Johannesburg
  • Franz Gmeiner
    Johannesburg
  • Grethe Kemp
    London
  • Ilya Spivak
    New York City
  • James Stanley
    New York City
  • Jeremy Naylor
    London
  • Jingyi Pan
    Singapore
  • John Bollinger
    Chicago
  • John Kicklighter
    New York City
  • Joshua Mahony
    London
  • Joshua Warner
    London
  • Justin McQueen
    London
  • Kathryn Gaw
    London
  • Katya Stead
    Johannesburg
  • Kelvin Ong
    Singapore
  • Kyle Rodda
    Australia
  • Mahmoud Alkudsi
    London
  • Margaret Yang
    Singapore
  • Martin Essex
    London
  • Michael Boutros
    New York City
  • Monte Safieddine
    Dubai
  • Nick Cawley
    London
  • Nyandabeh Ella Vincent
    Chicago
  • Pam Claasen
    Johannesburg
  • Patrick Foot
    Bristol
  • Paul Robinson
    New York
  • Reo Liao
    Australia
  • Rich Dvorak
    Chicago
  • Richard Snow
    Johannesburg
  • Sam Dickens
    London
  • Shane Walton
    Australia
  • Shannon Correia
    Johannesburg
  • Shaun Murison
    Johannesburg
  • Sibulele Sikuni
    London
  • Tammy Da Costa
    Johannesburg
  • Ted Jackson
    Chicago
  • Thomas Westwater
    New York City
  • Timothy Joubert
    Johannesburg
  • Travis Robson
    Johannesburg
  • Victoria Scholar
    London
  • Victoria Scholar
    London
  • Warren Venketas
    Johannesburg
  • Will Hall-Smith
    London
  • Yeap Jun Rong
    Singapore

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited and IG Markets South Africa Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. International accounts are offered by IG Markets Limited in the UK (FCA Number 195355), a juristic representative of IG Markets South Africa Limited (FSP No 41393). South African residents are required to obtain the necessary tax clearance certificates in line with their foreign investment allowance and may not use credit or debit cards to fund their international account.

window.$CQ = window.jQuery; window.IG = window.IG || {}; window.IG.cq = window.IG.cq || {};
{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","mainEntityOfPage":"https://www.ig.com/za/news-and-trade-ideas/indices-news/trader-thoughts---the-long-and-short-of-it-181018","headline":"Trader thoughts - the long and short of it","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://a.c-dn.net/c/content/dam/publicsites/igcom/shared/News and analysis images NEW/General misc/bg_data_680021.JPG/1420558280222.JPG","height":230,"width":320},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"IG","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://a.c-dn.net/c/etc/designs/onedomain/20082020/images/IG-60x70.png","height":60,"width":60}},"datePublished":"2018-10-18T23:38:12+0100","dateModified":"2018-10-18T23:38:12+0100","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Kyle Rodda"},"description":"

Just when it looked like it was safe to jump back into financial markets, it was risk-off again overnight, as market participants dwelled once more on the myriad of risks facing them.

\n","isAccessibleForFree":"True"} if(document.cookie.indexOf('userGdprLevel={"userLevel":"1"')>0){window["optimizely"]=window["optimizely"]||[];window.optimizely.push(["skipPageTracking"]);window["optimizely"].push(["optOutThirdPartyCookies"])}