Skip to content

Important Notice: IG Markets South Africa will no longer provide Trading Accounts. This change does not affect existing International/offshore accounts. New applications will be supported by IG International, part of IG Group, via https://www.ig.com/en. Important Notice: IG Markets South Africa will no longer provide Trading Accounts. This change does not affect existing International/offshore accounts. New applications will be supported by IG International, part of IG Group, via https://www.ig.com/en.

Bitcoin slides as ETF outflows hit demand and momentum weakens

​​Bitcoin slips as ETF outflows and fading institutional demand weigh on momentum, leaving price vulnerable near key support levels.​

Image of a gold Bitcoin coin standing upright on its side on a light brown wooden desk. Source: Bloomberg

Written by

Axel Rudolph

Axel Rudolph

Market Analyst

Publication date

​​​Bitcoin continues to slide

Bitcoin has navigated a volatile and increasingly nuanced period over the past few weeks, with price action shaped by a combination of shifting institutional flows, evolving macro sentiment and changing positioning dynamics across derivatives markets.

​After staging a strong recovery from early to late March, the cryptocurrency has entered a more uncertain phase, characterised by alternating advances and pullbacks as conviction fluctuates.

​In the early part of the period, Bitcoin benefited from a notable resurgence in institutional demand. Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) saw a strong wave of inflows, with more than $2 billion entering these products between late February and mid-March. This surge in capital helped underpin a steady recovery in price, tightening available supply and reinforcing the narrative that institutional participation continues to provide structural support for the asset.

​That influx of capital coincided with a broader improvement in sentiment across digital assets. Bitcoin climbed steadily, supported by reduced leverage following earlier deleveraging and a more balanced derivatives environment. Funding rates remained relatively contained, allowing the rally to develop without immediately triggering the kind of overcrowded positioning that often precedes sharp reversals.

​However, as the weeks progressed, signs began to emerge that the pace of institutional demand was slowing. Weekly ETF inflows dropped significantly, with just under $100 million recorded in one week, a marked decline from earlier levels. This moderation in demand hinted at a shift from aggressive accumulation towards more cautious and tactical positioning among institutional investors.

​The turning point came more recently, when flows into Bitcoin-linked products reversed more decisively. On Thursday the 26th of March, investors withdrew approximately $171 million from US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs, marking the largest single-day outflow in over three weeks. The withdrawals were broad-based, affecting all major funds rather than being concentrated in a single product.

​BlackRock’s IBIT fund led the outflows, with around $42 million exiting the vehicle, while other large ETFs including Fidelity’s FBTC, Grayscale’s GBTC, Bitwise’s BITB and Ark’s ARKB each saw redemptions in the range of $20 million to $30 million. This synchronised reduction in exposure across multiple funds underscored a coordinated shift in institutional positioning rather than isolated profit-taking.

​The broader weekly picture reinforced this trend. After the earlier surge in inflows, net flows turned negative, with roughly $70 million in outflows recorded during the current week. This marked a clear reversal in momentum and suggested that institutional investors were reassessing their exposure following the recent rally.

​These flow dynamics have had a direct impact on Bitcoin’s price behaviour. While the earlier inflows helped drive a sustained advance, the subsequent slowdown and reversal have contributed to a loss of upward momentum. Without consistent institutional demand to absorb supply, rallies have become more fragile and more prone to reversal once resistance levels are approached.

​Derivatives positioning has amplified these shifts. During the recovery phase, long exposure gradually rebuilt as traders positioned for further upside. When ETF flows began to weaken and price momentum stalled, these newly established longs became vulnerable. Stop-loss orders were triggered as prices slipped, leading to liquidations that accelerated downside moves and reinforced the sense of instability.

​Despite this near-term volatility, underlying structural indicators remain relatively stable. Long-term holders have not shown widespread signs of distribution, and exchange balances have not surged dramatically. This suggests that the recent price swings have been driven primarily by tactical flows and positioning adjustments rather than a fundamental shift in long-term conviction.

​The broader context also remains important. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, launched in early 2024, have fundamentally reshaped the market by providing a regulated and accessible channel for institutional capital. While flows can be volatile on a day-to-day basis, their overall presence continues to anchor Bitcoin within institutional portfolios and reinforces its role as a core digital asset.

​Looking ahead, Bitcoin’s trajectory will likely depend on whether institutional flows stabilise and return to net inflows, or whether the current period of caution persists. A renewed pickup in ETF demand could provide the foundation for another leg higher, particularly if accompanied by balanced positioning in derivatives markets. Conversely, continued outflows and fragile sentiment could keep the asset range-bound or expose it to further corrective pressure.

​For now, the past few weeks illustrate a market in transition. Strong institutional inflows initially drove a powerful recovery, but the subsequent slowdown and reversal in ETF demand have highlighted how sensitive Bitcoin remains to shifts in capital allocation. As a result, price action continues to oscillate between structural support and short-term fragility, reflecting a market still searching for its next clear directional catalyst.

​Bitcoin bearish case:

​While no bullish reversal takes Bitcoin above its 25 March high at $71,879.57, downside pressure should retain the upper hand with the 22 March low at $67,348.04 expected to be revisited.

​A fall through it would push the February-to-March uptrend line at $66,665.00 to the fore. Further down support may be found between the 12 to 19 February lows at $65,631.93 - $65,107.17. Below this area lies the 8 March low at $65,618.93.

​Bitcoin bullish case:

​As long as Bitcoin remains above its 12 February low at $65,107.17, it remains within a broad sideways trading range. A rise above this week's $71,879.57 high is needed, though, for a bullish reversal to become possible. Only then could the 8 February high at $72,240.57 and above be revisited.

​Short-term outlook:

Bearish while below the 25 March high at $71,879.57.

​Medium-term outlook:

Neutral with a bearish bias while below the 17 March high at $76,008.43 but above the 24 February low at $62,527.40.

Bitcoin daily candlestick chart

Bitcoin daily candlestick chart Source: TradingView
Bitcoin daily candlestick chart Source: TradingView

Important to know

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.