The FTSE 100 and DAX 40 hover above key technical support levels as investors assess escalation risks whilst the Middle East conflict enters its second month with oil elevated.
Investors have remained on edge in recent weeks, with concern building as the Middle East conflict moves into its second month and uncertainty continues to dominate market sentiment.
Markets are largely focused on two potential paths. The first is escalation, where deeper US involvement could extend beyond air and naval operations into a more direct military presence.
Such a development would likely heighten geopolitical risk, pushing oil prices higher on supply disruption fears, strengthening safe-haven assets like the US dollar and Treasuries, and putting additional pressure on global equities, particularly in Europe.
Even though all major stock indices are expected to suffer in such a scenario, defence stocks could outperform, while energy-sensitive and trade-exposed sectors would likely lag.
The alternative is de-escalation, where the US limits its involvement or pursues diplomatic solutions. In that case, risk appetite would likely improve, with equities stabilising or rebounding, oil prices easing, and volatility declining. Investors would then refocus on macro drivers such as inflation and central bank policy.
Investors would then refocus on macro drivers such as inflation and central bank policy.
Even in the event of a ceasefire and a full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a return to normal oil flows would not be immediate. Shipping backlogs, rerouted cargoes and congestion at ports mean it could take weeks, if not months, for supply chains to fully normalise.
While some shipments could resume within days, clearing queues and restoring typical transit schedules would be a gradual process. As a result, oil prices, currently around 40% above pre-conflict levels, are likely to remain elevated for some time.
Persistently high oil prices are adding complexity to the outlook for central banks. Rising energy costs feed directly into headline inflation and indirectly into core prices via transport and production, increasing the risk of a renewed inflationary impulse.
Markets have already scaled back expectations for rate cuts, with policymakers likely to maintain a “higher for longer” stance. In some cases, such as the European Central Bank, rate hikes cannot be ruled out. The Bank of England faces similar challenges as inflation risks remain elevated.
Oil price surges create several challenges:
Headline inflation rises directly from energy costs
Core inflation affected through multiple transmission channels
Rate cut expectations must be abandoned or reversed
Some central banks may resume tightening cycles
Economic growth suffers creating stagflation risks
Global equity indices appear to have found tentative support near recent lows, which align with key technical levels from October to November. This raises the possibility of a short-term rebound.
However, a break below the 23 March low at 9,669 in the FTSE 100 would significantly weaken the technical outlook and could signal the formation of a medium-term top.
In that scenario, the index may decline towards the 8,825 level, aligning with the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of the 2025-to-2026 advance which sits within the 8,909-to-8,900 region seen between the March and June 2025 highs.
If support at the current March 9,669 holds, a rebound towards the 10,450-to-10,500 area is possible, though this may act as resistance.
Though weaker than its British counterpart as it has so far found support around the half-way mark of its 2025-to-2026 bull market, the German DAX 40 stock index’s line in the sand is also the 23 March low, at 21,864.
A fall through and daily chart close below the 21,864 level could trigger a swift drop towards the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of the 2025-to-2026 uptrend and the 2022-to-2026 uptrend line at 21,186-to-21,147.
If support at 21,864 holds, a recovery towards the mid-March high and 200-day simple moving average (SMA) at 23,957-to-24,100 may ensue.
Short-term market direction is likely to be dictated by geopolitical developments, including statements from President Trump and responses from Iran. In this environment, technical levels provide an important framework for navigating volatility.
Investors concerned about further downside may consider placing stop-loss orders just below key support levels to protect existing positions. Guaranteed stop-loss orders, where available, can help mitigate the risk of slippage during volatile or gap-prone markets.
Unlike standard stop-loss orders, guaranteed stops ensure execution at a specified level, offering greater certainty during periods of heightened geopolitical risk.
Investors and traders managing positions during geopolitical crises have several options. Here's how to approach current environment:
Research geopolitical situation, technical levels and risk scenarios thoroughly. Understanding multiple factors helps inform decisions. Trading for beginners provides background but it is probably safer for this kind of investor to wait for the situation in the Middle East to calm down and for volatility to diminish as this would reduce risk.
Choose whether you want to maintain positions, implement hedges or reduce exposure. Spread betting and CFD trading offer flexibility.
Open an account with broker offering comprehensive risk management tools including guaranteed stops.
Review positions on your chosen trading platform. Consider appropriate stop-loss placement based on technical analysis.
Implement risk management based on analysis and risk tolerance. Place stop-loss orders protecting against adverse moves particularly using guaranteed stops during geopolitical uncertainty.
Remember geopolitical events create substantial uncertainty and potential for gaps. Only maintain positions sized appropriately for potential losses, using risk management tools protecting capital during Middle East crises and volatile market conditions
This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.