The information on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG Bank S.A. accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it and as such is considered to be a marketing communication.
What we have seen are modest tweaks to their growth estimates that simply acknowledge the better data of late. The fact that the Fed still see the risks to the US economy as ‘roughly balanced’ has kept a lid on some of the moves in financial markets, but the fact that 11 of the 17 voting members are calling for ‘at least three’ rate hikes in 2017 reverberated around trading floors.
Janet Yellen was probed about an impending boost in productivity, largely as a result of potential fiscal stimulus from “Trumponomics”. In response, the Fed chair maintained a similar line as we recently heard from St Louis Fed President James Bullard. That being, until the Fed know the specifics they are simply not going to alter their projections. As it is, they see 2.1% growth in 2017. This estimate is modestly below the economist’s consensus of 2.2%, while US GDP in 2018 is expected to drop somewhat to 2%. Could it actually be that for the first time in years we are looking at a central bank who have to revise up their forecasts? Well, it was made fairly clear that the Fed are still on edge and believe there are a number of variables that could derail this recent run of form. There are clearly a lot of questions that need answers and of course the Fed are happy to show a degree of patience before reacting. This seems prudent.
The increase to their forecast on rate hikes has got the lion’s share of attention, with the Fed now forecasting three hikes in 2017 and 2018. The reaction on this has been quite dramatic, with the interest rate markets (Fed fund future) now fully discounting two hikes in 2017, but also holding a 30% chance of three. We have seen a strong sell-off in US bond markets, noticeably in the five-year treasury, with the yield increasing from 1.88% to currently stand at 2.01%. Given these dynamics in fixed income, we have seen good buying in the USD, with USD/JPY hitting a session high of ¥116.78 and gold finding better sellers for a move below $1150. US banks initially rallied, but have since reversed and followed the broader equity markets lower. I would highlight that while US bond yields have pushed strongly higher, it has not been backed by a rise in inflation expectations. This has seen ‘real’ yields turn positive, which is being taken as a strong tightening of financial conditions and thus an equity negative. US REITS are getting sold fairly heavily; it’s worth highlighting that all sectors on the S&P 500 are lower, but the market is rallying into the close. The emerging market complex has been sold fairly aggressively, with the EEM (Emerging Market ETF) down 2.1%.
AUD/USD has been hit fairly hard on the Fed projections, trading from $0.7500 to a low of $0.7413, clearly not helped by the selling in emerging market assets. Commodities are hardly an inspiration for those holding AUD longs, with spot iron ore falling 5.1% yesterday and weakness seen overnight in steel and iron ore futures. US crude is 2.8% lower from the ASX 200 cash close.
While there is still some way to go until the open of the Asian markets, it looks as though we may see a somewhat mixed affair in the fortunes of the markets. The ASX 200 should open around 5565, with the Aussie banks likely to open on a flat note, while BHP is eyeing weakness. The Nikkei 225 will likely be the region’s outperformer, given the rally in USD/JPY, but keep an eye on China as the strength in the USD is not going to be welcomed by the number of Chinese corporates who have to borrow from debt markets to fund much of the recently announced acquisitions.