This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
In the demand-supply equation, there are little doubts that global oil demand is set to rise in the longer-term, the uncertainty in production however remains a constant debate.
Oil markets have been swayed recently by news from OPEC and co., charging higher as the coalition avowed lower production from the month of August before plunging on news of higher-than-expected production levels. Notably, members including Libya and Nigeria, unbound by production caps, have been cited like problem children of the lot while OPEC’s overall compliance had been seen at only 86% in July. The latest OPEC compliance meeting certainly went about trying to improve this issue with conclusions of the meeting suggesting that laggards are expected to better adhere to agreements and seek full conformity, though details on how this would be achieved were absent.
Zooming into the root of the issue, we find a group of major oil producers trying to rein in prices via output in order to fend off a key competitor, the US. Simply put, this is an evolving problem of game theory. Comparatively, decentralised producers in the US respond primarily to price signals. While pinpointing the constantly fluctuating breakeven price for US producers may be a herculean task, we have seen softer crude prices, particularly the recent sub-$46/bbl range, exerting pressure on US crude producers of late.
Rig counts have visibly witnessed a cap, plateauing just above 760, as reported by Baker Hughes, while crude inventories clocked consecutive weeks of drawdowns into the end of July. On the other hand, one would also recall that recovering crude prices since 2016 have brought many oil rigs back online, capping prices on the top end and producing this wedge for prices against OPEC’s output levels. The behemoth task of curbing supply to push up prices certainly appears to have fallen upon OPEC’s shoulders.
For the nearer term, we may however expect some upsides with crude. The latest renewed commitment to improve production compliance by OPEC may be the panacea for near term gains, if effected, riding against the backdrop of slowing US output. Seasonally lower Saudi Arabian production from the month of August coupled with higher global oil demand also places the bias on the upside for prices. Prices may find their way towards the higher end of the consolidation rage, looking towards $52/bbl with a break above the $50/bbl psychological resistance for WTI futures.