Stocks dip in volatile Friday trading

US stock index benchmarks are currently in the red, in what has been a choppy trading session so far on Wall Street.

There’s nothing that affects the US stock market more at the moment than hints from the Fed on the future of its monetary stimulus.

Yesterday we had comments from New York Fed President William Dudley suggesting the FOMC might continue stimulus for longer if economic data does not meet their forecasts.

Today though Jeremy Stein, a voting member of the FOMC like Mr Dudley, seemed to suggest the September meeting could be a key point for a decision on tapering.

‘The best approach is for the committee to be clear that in making a decision in, say, September, it will give primary weight to the large stock of news that has accumulated since the inception of the program and will not be unduly influenced by whatever data releases arrive in the few weeks before the meeting,’ he said.

This down-playing of the soft economic data seen in recent weeks, has got investors nervous again that the Fed may be ready to taper in the next few FOMC meetings. The Dow Jones was down 0.3% at 14980 by early afternoon in New York, while the S&P 500 was down just 0.07% at 1612.

Jeffrey Lacker, President of the Richmond Fed, added weight to the view that the September meeting is being considered for introducing tapering, saying that it ‘is certainly a candidate" for when stimulus could be scaled back, though he echoed Dudley’s view yesterday that any decision was dependent on economic data.

The trouble is that rather than one clear message coming through from the Fed, we are hearing multiple versions with slightly different perspectives. The intention is to add clarity, but the result is actually the opposite, with market participants often choosing to hear what they want.

The consistent thread that I see is that the decision to taper is data dependent. Loogically this would suggest that the decision to taper in September or October or whenever cannot have been even pencilled in yet, yet this does not jibe with some of the comments made today.

On the data front, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported that its Chicago Purchasing Managers Index fell to 51.6 in June, far worse than had been expected and a big drop from May’s 58.7. The final reading of the University of Michigan’s index of consumer sentiment improved to 84.1 from the mid-month preliminary reading of 82.7.

The gold price has bounced back to $1225 per troy ounce today, after breaking below $1200 briefly yesterday, but a 2% gain is slight in the context of the 14% of value that has been shed in just the last two weeks.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.