Fed's asset-purchasing program in focus

Quantitative easing continues to be unwound as a further $10 billion is removed from the asset-purchasing program.

This takes the month bond-purchasing program to $55 billion a month, with $5 billion coming out of both treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.

Previous chair Ben Bernanke had gone to great lengths to stipulate the differences between the asset-purchasing program and the record low Fed funds rate which makes up QE. However, last year he stated in his Q&A testimony that taper could begin in 2013, which caused mass jitters in equity markets and a selloff in the bond market.

In her first address as chair, Janet Yellen used language which is heavily open to interpretation. Yellen was asked to define the change in stance from the Fed funds rate remaining at near-zero "for a considerable time” after the asset-purchasing program ends, to "well past the time".  Her response received more attention than the rest of her hour testimony; she said the Fed see considerable as “around six months”.

The market spilled on the prospect of rates being raised as early as March 2015; something none seem to be positioned for.  The end of the asset-purchasing program is open-ended and also open to interpretation. On current form it could be completely unwound in October.

The market was also caught on the back-foot at the size of the rate rises, with the FOMC moving its medium expectations for the Fed funds rates from 0.75% to 1% by the end of 2015, and from 1.75% to 2.25% by the end of 2016. The market consensus before the meeting was for rates to be at 0.65% by the end of 2015 and that sent the bond markets into a tail spin.

Two-year and five-year treasuries rates jumped as equity reacted violently to the news (although it must be said on fairly mild volumes). Gold shed a further 0.8%, including $10 in 20 minutes as the USD investment case rose.

The shift in central bank standing from dovish to neutral (there are even touches of hawkishness in this statement) over the past four months has made the USD an investment currency once more despite pressure from a rather adverse winter.

Yellen believes the blimp in economic data seen in Q1 from the winter weather is likely to filter out in Q2 and that puts risk pairs at the forefront of investors’ minds. Sizeable volumes were seen in the crosses with EUR, AUD and NZD (all sold down) as USD/JPY was bid up. This hasn’t saved the Nikkei from the equity carnage crossing Asia, as the inverse correction with the JPY didn’t hold, which saw the Nikkei lose 1.5%, the Hang Seng lose 1.1% and ASX fall 1%.

The currency pair of choice remains USD/CAD as central bank differentials remain a key driver of the pair. The hawkish to dovish ratio continues to move further apart as the commodities-driven Canadian economy sees softness and the BoC talks of rate cuts, compared to the Fed which is now expecting rate rises on the strengthening US economy. The breakout looks telling (see below).

Stimulus for China?

What moderated the scale of rout in Asia has been news that China is looking to release measures to expand domestic demand and stabilise economic growth. The state council has announced that it will see China speeding up construction and infrastructure projects after several sodden industrial production numbers.

The increased downward pressure seen in the Chinese economy over the last two months was likely to trigger a response from central powers. Extrapolating out the last industrial production read, Q1 GDP is likely to hit 7%, well below the reconfirmed 7.5% growth figure the central goversnment wants to see.

Ahead of the European Open

Europe is bracing for similar sell offs seen in the US and Asia, as S&P futures see a further 0.25% coming out of the market after last night’s fade-out. Both the FTSE and DAX have seen downward pressure throughout the month of March and the news that the carry-trade out of the US could be coming to an end sooner than expected could halt the year to date momentum.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.