CAPEX survey adds to tubby calls

We continue to look for trade ideas where we can in this market.

Source: Bloomberg

There are plenty around, however I have been saying over the past few months that one needs to be nimble, have clear ranges and be willing to trade both long and short positions.

I believe my ASX tubby strategy is the correct call in the current market: what will make the ASX get to and HOLD above 5400 points?

Bank support is the most likely reason; their size has the most influence on the index. The fundamental mover in the banks is currently asset quality (which has been proven to be strong this earnings season) and growth seeing record cash earnings.

However, the market appears to be waiting to be proven right in its belief that asset quality is declining. It has been trading banking stocks to the downside in anticipation that bad and doubtful debts are ticking up and asset quality is starting to decline, despite the February reports.

Either way, the banks look to be unable to drive the ASX to 5400 and above, however nor will they drag it under 4750 as net yields are already appealing and further falls will make that yield even more attractive. The big four (bar CBA) have grossed up yields in double digits to 2011/12 levels.

This brings me to yesterday’s CAPEX data and how it also feeds into my tubby strategy.

No matter how you cut the 2016/17 CAPEX intensions survey, the CAPEX cliff is still ever-present and shows no signs its nearing a bottom.

$82.6 billion in 2016/17 is a 23% decline from the previous survey and the lowest read in years.

It’s hugely disappointing and the survey has to bring the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) into play as the federal government is unlikely to add stimulus spending, even though it’s an election year. This means Martin Place will have to do the heavily lifting to try stimulate growth in the Australian economy.

Interestingly, the Interbank banks were rather unresponsive to the figures. The March, April and May markets only added a 2% chance in each month for a 25 basis point cut to eventuate.

This low movement may be explained by Australian bonds yields currently at cheap prices and corporate borrowing already at record low levels, yet not seeing increases in borrowings.

This is the main issue facing the RBA. Further cuts may not provide the incentive for further corporate spending. Instead, it may spur on additional residential borrowing – something it’s trying to avoid.

The CAPEX survey is a conundrum for the RBA and the Australian economy, and it further strengthens point two of my ASX strategy.    

The ASX ‘tubby’ strategy

Strategically, the ASX’s 2016 path has a distinctly ‘tubby’ and ‘squat’ profile – a historically wider trading range (tubbiness) with relatively low aggregated capital growth (squatness).

The ASX has suffered from this for the past 7 months; the Chinese devaluation in August has seen this ‘stout’ and ‘tubby’ strategy becoming ingrained as the short-term norm.

 Where to from here?

One of two things may happen:

  1. Markets (ASX included) will collapse and become fundamentally ‘cheap’ – the six-and-a-half-year bull market only ended six months ago. The correction in January had distinct characteristics of being overvalued in the current cycle and is looking for structural weakness.
  2. Markets will remain volatile and trade in a directionless manner with a tubby and stout 2016 profile. Macroeconomic fundamentals, the oil price and inflation will leave markets in a state of flux if they don’t break down.

What’s more likely?

Three things that we have noticed in these first weeks of 2016:

  • The correction in January was based on one of the bigger fears in macroeconomics – an emerging markets crash, with China as the driver. Macroeconomists see the financial crisis as a three-pronged event, starting with US sub-prime, then European sovereign crisis, and followed by EM devaluations and capital outflows.
  • Earnings, while ahead of market expectations to the earnings per share (EPS) line (beating 55% of the time for the ASX its slightly better for the S&P), have declined half on half (or quarter on quarter), with the majority of 2016 guidance releases being ‘cautious’ to ‘negative’ due to ‘uncertain conditions’.
  • The rebound over the past 10 days appears to be positioning rather than a fundamental change in the underlying markets – the ASX particularly has a structural ‘fear’ trade which is why I see volatile range trading as a more likely scenario, due to the fact that banks and materials control its direction.

On the financial side of the ASX, banks are under sustained pressure. This is due to ‘being overvalued’, ‘housing bubbles’ and ‘lower growth’.

On the materials side of the ASX, firms are mere shadows of their former selves. This is due to cyclical bear markets in commodities, emerging market demand evaporating and cost-out strategies being initiated.

The trade

With this as a base, my strategy for the ASX is trading a ‘tubby’ and ‘stout’ movement, with a possible capitulation trade as the end game.  A break below the 10 February level means that ASX is moving towards its ‘fundamentally cheap price’. However, it’s more likely it will range trade until the end of the financial year.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.