RBS privatisation unlikely in the short-term

RBS is in the red, with traders playing the wait-and-see game, after the bank’s privatisation was described as ‘not urgent’.

The comment came last week from the secretary of state for business, innovation and skills, Vincent Cable, who stated that there is no need to rush the privatisation of RBS. The bank overstretched itself during the credit boom and required financial assistance, so it is now 82% owned by the UK government. The aim of the rescue was to prevent the bank from collapsing and bring stability to the UK banking sector during the credit crunch. In the past few years, RBS has sold off ‘non-core’ assets in an effort to raise cash, strengthen its balance sheet and most importantly make it more attractive to prospective buyers.

There have been a number of different options available to the UK government, one of which is to offer shares to members of the public. Mr Cable is happy with the progress being made to privatise the bank, but warned that the process should not be too hasty. While the UK government owns a majority stake in RBS its share price will remain relatively low, but once there is talk of the privatisation going ahead we could see more interest in the company.

Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc chart

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.