The crude oil price has climbed above $110 per barrel as intensifying Iran conflict raises fears of major Middle East supply disruptions and Strait of Hormuz closure.
Oil prices have surged above $100 per barrel for the first time since 2022 as the war involving Iran intensifies, raising fears of a major disruption to global energy supplies.
The rapid move highlights how sensitive the oil market remains to geopolitical shocks, particularly in the Middle East, which sits at the heart of global oil production and transport.
The latest rally was triggered by escalating military strikes between Iran, Israel and the United States, which have targeted infrastructure and widened the conflict across the region. Markets reacted immediately as traders priced in the risk of supply disruptions.
Brent crude oil climbed above $113 per barrel, while US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) briefly approached $120, its highest level since June 2022.
The move follows a dramatic rally over the past week, with oil prices jumping more than 50% as fears grew that the conflict could damage production facilities or restrict shipping routes in the Persian Gulf.
At the centre of the market panic is the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply passes each day.
Iran has threatened shipping through the strait, and tanker movements have slowed sharply following missile threats and attacks on oil infrastructure.
Even partial disruption removes millions of barrels of oil per day from global markets. Some Gulf producers have already reduced output due to storage constraints and logistical disruptions caused by the conflict.
In addition, Israeli strikes on Iranian oil facilities and retaliatory attacks across the region have added further uncertainty about the stability of energy infrastructure.
Oil markets tend to move aggressively during geopolitical crises because supply risks are difficult to quantify. Iran itself produces roughly 3.5 million barrels of crude per day, accounting for about 4% of global oil supply, meaning any disruption could have global consequences.
But the bigger concern is regional contagion. The Gulf region collectively produces around one-third of the world’s oil, and any broader conflict involving Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait or the UAE could dramatically tighten supply.
In such situations, oil prices often rise well beyond what fundamentals justify because traders build in a geopolitical risk premium.
The surge in crude has begun to ripple across financial markets beyond energy sector. US stock futures dropped sharply, with the Dow Jones futures falling more than 1000 points as investors worried about inflation and slower economic growth caused by higher energy costs.
Another direct effect of the Middle East crisis is not just being felt by financial markets but also by the consumers as fuel prices are already rising in many countries, and economists warn that sustained oil above $100 could reignite global inflation just as central banks were beginning to stabilise prices.
Traders have already replaced this year’s rate cut expectations with pricing in one rate hike by the Bank of England (BoE) and two hikes by the European Central Bank (ECB) before year-end. In the US a previously expected rate cut for July has been pushed back to September.
Governments are responding as well. G7 countries are reportedly discussing a coordinated release of strategic oil reserves to calm markets and prevent further price spikes.
The direction of oil prices now depends almost entirely on how the war evolves.
Several scenarios are possible with dramatically different outcomes:
If military activity subsides and tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz resumes normally, the geopolitical risk premium could fade quickly. Historically, oil spikes during conflicts often retrace once markets realise that supply disruption is limited.
If attacks continue but do not significantly damage production or transport infrastructure, oil could remain elevated for weeks or even months as traders price in ongoing risk. This represents middle-ground scenario.
The most extreme scenario would be a full blockade of the strait lasting several months or a major attack on Gulf oil facilities. Analysts warn that such a disruption could send oil well above $150 and trigger a global economic shock.
Previous oil shocks offer perspective on potential impacts.
For now, oil markets are trading less on traditional fundamentals and more on geopolitical developments. Every new military strike, shipping disruption or diplomatic move is being immediately reflected in crude prices.
Until there is clarity on the trajectory of the Iran conflict, oil is likely to remain highly volatile - with the potential for both sharp spikes and sudden reversals depending on the next developments in the war.
Investors and traders navigating oil market volatility have several options.
Remember oil markets can be extraordinarily volatile during conflicts. Only trade with capital you can afford to lose, and maintain diversification given substantial risks during Middle East crises.
This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.