This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
The S&P bank ETF has gained 12% since Donald Trump’s election, and while some of this euphoria will fade, it is not impossible to believe that the long rally from the lows of 2009 has entered a new phase.
The bullish case for US banks is built on the idea that we are entering an era of higher interest rates, coupled with a president that is keen to roll back some of the legislation enacted in the wake of financial crisis. The new administration has made noises about lifting some regulations, with the Dodd-Frank provisions mentioned during the course of last week, which may be why the sector enjoyed such a strong move.
Of course, actual detail is still lacking, and may be for some time, but one possibility is that the minimum asset threshold for banks designated as ‘too big to fail’ (TBTF) is $50 billion. If this is lifted to $250 billion then many US banks might find themselves outside of the TBTF designation, giving them more capital to expand their businesses.
For the biggest banks, a limiting of Dodd-Frank provisions could allow the return of some activities such as proprietary trading, while a reduction in regulations would reduce costs and increase profitability, raising the prospect of higher dividends.
On the interest rate front, a period of higher inflation caused by increase infrastructure spending and tax cuts could see the Federal Reserve having to move more quickly, and more dramatically, than many had expected. Global banks have seen their profitability hit by record-low interest rates, but with the Fed already talking about raising rates (after a hike in December 2015), investors were on the lookout for any sign that further rate increases were on their way. Indeed, data has shown that ETFs tracking financial stocks saw seven consecutive weeks of inflows in the period to 9 November, a phenomenon that may accelerate now that Donald Trump has won and talk of stimulus is in the air.
At present US banks currently trade at around 11 times forward earnings, versus a low of 9 times in February 2016. At the peak of the crisis, the sector traded at over 33 times earnings. A removal of regulations could see banks due for a re-rating, particularly if Trump also succeeds in boosting US economic growth through his stimulus plans.
We can use the price chart of the SPDR S&P Bank ETF as a representation of the broader index. The price moved above 4000 this week, its highest level since the beginning of 2009, and above the high of 3725 that was seen in 2015. At present the price is heavily overbought, so for the time being it may be best to wait for a bigger pullback. Nonetheless, buying on the dip would seem to be the approach here, especially if the new administration’s policies begin to match expectations.