Duo action risks

The macro duo of the FOMC and Greece continue to create jitters – it will be a daily theme for the next month; in the case of the Fed, the next three to four months.

Federal Reserve
Source: Bloomberg

Vigilance is the best word and way to describe my strategy currently. 

What’s spiking my interest:

US data overnight was surprisingly weak – although not country-wide. The Empire State manufacturing index declined 1.98, estimates were expecting a 5.2 expansion from the 3.09 in the previous month.

Industrial production was hit hard as well – most point to the USD strength and a slide in mining – the data was down 0.2% last month; estimates were for a 0.3% growth figure.

The US data just adds to the indifference – the US economy’s expansion clearly isn’t uniformed; employment is booming, economic activity is varied (sales solid, production not) and growth at last print was contracting.

The FOMC meeting on Thursday should be a possible catalyst for direction – No ‘lift-off’ scenario but the ‘communication’ should give some indication of a possible timeframe for lift-off.

Grexit: Here is what we see as the biggest risk – Bank deposit run-ons. If the IMF and the ECB get a whiff of a mass run on, it will pull is cash tranches - sharpish. It is a real risk: last night €400 million fled Greek banks 60% above the average of the past few weeks of €250 million. No IMF or ECB funding will be needed or given if Greek banks are insolvent - period.

From the equity perspective the S&P has weathered the macro distractions rather well - it is far from having a correction. In fact, it’s been 1,350 days since the last 10% down move in the US for a 94% return. Even with a Fed lift-off scenario, it would require some strong selling and Greece for the US appears to be a distraction.

China is also an interesting scenario. The CSRC yesterday banned all OTC margin lending, leverage and collateral asset trading – not unexpected. However, the volumes through Chinese markets currently are mind boggling – in the past five days A-shares (Shanghai and Shenzhen) have averaged a daily turnover of US$323 billion that is double the daily average of the S&P.

Leverage is a key part of China’s current market turnover. OTC isn’t a huge part of that leverage trading, however, it is still a sizable potion to be taking out of the market. If the CSRC was to regulate leverage trading that volume would evaporate and a 10% correction would happen in a single session.

Australia is at an interesting inflection point. The sell-off in the morning session yesterday was quickly and healthily reversed in the afternoon. The reasoning came down to the banks - the fundamental stats are staking up for some buying support. However, the minutes today may stifle future expectations if macro-prudential rules where further discussed.

RBA minutes – language, language, language – targeted monetary talk, talk about macro-prudential regulations and talk about ‘rate effectiveness’ key to the ASX, the AUD and future rate expectations. This is why I see possible disappointment in the minutes today from a trading perspective. 

Ahead of the Australian open

We are currently calling the ASX flat at 5536 - the banks are likely to be a support space for the market, materials a drag. BHP’s ADR is pointing to a 1.1% decline on the open this morning.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.