Deleveraging wipe over $1 trillion off Chinese stock markets

The recent rout on the China equity markets wiped off $ 1.2 trillion off the total market capitalisation, from its peak of $ 10 trillion on Sunday 14 June. And we have not taken into consideration today’s plunge. 

Victoria Harbour China
Source: Bloomberg

It turned out that Friday is no longer a magical day for Chinese equities, given the sharp losses that was seen on two consecutive Fridays.

The sell-off was across the board, with blue chips, and smaller-cap alike decimated. The CSI 300 pierced through the 4500 support to reach a 10-week low, diving 7.8%.

Only the ChiNext fared worse, plunging almost 9%, and well within bear territory. The technology-heavy index have plummeted 27% from its peak on Friday 5 June, and closed below key 3000 handle on Friday.

If you are a speculator, then you may do well to heed Morgan Stanley’s advice of ‘don’t buy the dip’. The investment bank said that ‘the balance of probabilities is that the top for the cycle on Shanghai, Shenzhen and the ChiNext has now taken place’.

While it may be tempting to point at the protracted Greek bailout talks as a possible reason for the decline, the truth is China is more or less orbiting in its own universe. A more plausible reason driving the bears is the unwinding of margin trading or deleveraging.

We have seen the outstanding level of margin debt, on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, fall for the fourth-straight day on Thursday, and it will not be unreasonable to expect another decline today. Increased equity supply, weak earnings growth, and lack of activity on the stimulus front compounded the sell-off.

Although I continue to be optimistic about the longer-term trend of the China markets, it’s clear that we are in a sharp correction phase. A shift in sentiments may materialise against the backdrop of deleveraging. This would precipitate a deeper correction. On that note, I agree with Morgan Stanley’s assessment. It will certainly not be wise to buy on dips now, given the intense downward momentum.

What will be interesting is how the Chinese state media will respond, or if we see any official statements from the authorities. The state-run newspapers have published front-page commentaries asserting that the fundamentals underpinning the bull market have not changed, in attempts to soothe jitters.

As the authorities have been reluctant, to unleash more monetary easing given the backdrop of a stabilising economy, they may resort to more verbal intervention to calm frayed sentiments. In the meantime, more bouts of extreme volatility are here to stay during the adjustment period.

Singapore banks lead decline

Local banks led the fall in the Straits Times Index (STI) on Friday amid renewed concerns over the Greek situation. As of 4.00pm, DBS, OCBC, and UOB posted more than 1% drop in their share prices.

Sentiments were also pressured by the carnage of Chinese stocks on mounting worries over increasing signs of deleveraging. Nonetheless, the STI remained bounded in the 3300-3350 range, as the market lacks conviction to push the index in either direction.

Noble is an anomaly, plumbing over 3% higher as of 4.03pm, with investor confidence seemingly supported by the recent spate of share buybacks and vote of confidence by a large institutional shareholder.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.