The capitulation ‘we had to have’

Are we witnessing the start of the ‘final capitulation’ these markets have been waiting for? Trade would suggest yes.

Source: Bloomberg
Source: Bloomberg

I have been discussing this very scenario with colleagues and peers over the past few weeks and we all have a similar take on what we could possibly transpire in a final capitulation scenario.

The key points of a final capitulation scenario are as follows:

1. A shake out of the final pockets of the market that have been holding and are forced to sell out or fear finally wins out.

2. A further technical correction in hyper-inflated equities. High P/E names are finally being asked to justify price; FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google) are classic examples, as are bio-medical stocks and financial institutions. The narrow trades in high P/E names are a risk at any price in the current market, in my opinion.

3. The central bank ‘life support’ trade of the past eight years has now created this ‘coma-like’ scenario were markets cannot return to normal trading and have been tracking sideways since August.

The artificial support from central banks is at a crossroads - central bank intervention will no longer create the holding pattern of the past year; markets now believe banks are out of ammunition.

4. The artificial support from central banks has fed banking stocks; the current conditions now have banking stocks facing a ‘crisis’ globally.

The questioning of Deutsche Bank’s capital position is a major development. The fears of a liquidity collapse and widening spreads will see more private banks fingered. Market rumours are that Credit Suisse is the next in line to have the ruler run over it.

American banks have lost over 20% in the year to date, as have the top three worst-performing sectors.

Credit spreads and funding issues are ramping up. Fears of a stalling US economy increasing the risk of bad and doubtful debts will all added to the selling pressure.

5. The JPY and NKY were shaken to the core yesterday – is this a translation of Chinese market risk? JGBs on the long end of the curve dipped into negative yields for the first time ever. A BoJ ‘emergency meeting’ must be a second capitulation away.

This isn’t good for Asian trading, considering Lunar New Year will create a bottleneck trading scenario. The prospect of Asian markets overshooting on their reopening after LNY is an increasing risk and will only accelerate the ‘final capitulation’ trade.

6. Australian banks are being swept up in the global banking selloff. This is interesting considering Australian banks are not as exposed to liquidity issues as their US and European counterparts. The reliance on the long end of the bond curve and wholesale funding is substantially lower for Australian banks – their retail exposure actually isolates them from funding risk.

However, Australian banks have now declined 15.2% year-to-date and almost 30% since the April 2015 high.

Whats more interesting is the financial sector’s performance compared to ASX peers.

Yields: The investment reasoning from 2011 is failing to support Australian banks in any form. CBA now has a net yield of 5.75% - the highest level since mid-2013. NAB has a net yield of 6.75% - its highest yield since mid-2012. Westpac’s 6.5% net yield is the highest since 2012.

I have been expecting the ASX to hold on to yield support at 4850 as the aggregated net yield of the ASX hits 5% - the highest level since 2011. In the final capitulation scenario that is playing out, test this hypothesis to the full.


This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.