Good, bad or indifferent?

Equity markets have closed the day mildly positive, and only time will tell if this initial reaction is the correct one.

It was certainly a day of two halves: before and after Ben Bernanke’s speech. Regardless of your stance, whether dovish or hawkish, this speech was so broadly worded that it was open to interpretation from both sides. The initial reaction of the markets has seen equity indices creep higher, but with a suitably mild manner, implying that by this time tomorrow we could easily see a reversal.

In the speech there appeared to be some signs of back-tracking over the fact that the Federal Reserve’s target for unemployment was 6.5%. Certainly it felt like there was more of an open policy about the levels it would like to see. However, we did receive reassurance that the Fed would like the markets to have sufficient momentum before it would look to reduce the current $85 billion monthly quantitative easing policy.

So, on the back of the Fed’s comments, where exactly does this leave the European equity markets? The short answer is probably just as confused as they have ever been. The biggest problem with being open to the world’s media on such large fiscal policies is that it is essential to keep your cards close to your chest, while at the same time divulging enough information to maintain confidence. This is a particularly difficult skill, and one that the Fed is having trouble mastering.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.