40 år i branschen
185 800 kunder världen över
15 000 marknader

Budget 2013: Stock market winners and losers

George Osborne’s 2013 Budget was viewed as something of a political success for the chancellor, but can we draw any lessons from stock market performance in the six months following it? 

As the chancellor lays out his plans for the year ahead, we take a look at the winners and losers from the 2013 Budget.

Some of the main points from the 2013 Budget were as follows:

- GDP growth forecast to be 0.6% for 2013
- Borrowing to hit £114 billion
- £3 billion added to infrastructure spending for 2015/16
- Corporation tax cut by 1% in April 2015
- New Help to Buy scheme for homebuyers
- Fuel duty and beer duty rises scrapped

A look back at performance

If we look at the performance of the FTSE 350 in the wake of the Budget, the winners and losers work out as follows:

Sector

% return

Telecoms Services 17.09
Consumer Discretionary 16.71
Healthcare 7.59
Industrials 6.71
Financials 6.05
Utilities 5.41
IT 3.13
Consumer Staples -2.38
Energy -2.68
Materials -3.53

 

Breaking these figures down into individual stocks presents a more interesting picture. Some of the top gainers from the FTSE 350 were house building companies, with investors buoyed by the Help to Buy scheme, which in the past year has prompted a surge in house prices, especially in London and the south-east.

In the six months after the Budget, Countrywide and Barratt Developments rose, by 28.3% and 23.4% respectively, while Rightmove, the property website, enjoyed a 25.1% rise. The housebuilding sector as a whole has continued to rise, and the decision to extend it to 2020 sets the stage for more gains in this sector.

Also in the list of winners were the pub groups JD Wetherspoon, Enterprise Inns and Mitchells & Butlers. Mr Osborne’s decision to scrap the planned rise in beer duty was partly the result of a sustained effort by the Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) that mobilised its members to lobby for a change in policy. Six months on from the Budget, JD Wetherspoon was 28% higher, Enterprise Inns had rallied 25% and Mitchells & Butlers was up 25%. The improving consumer outlook played its part too, with UK drinkers feeling able to spend more of their hard-earned cash in the nation’s pubs.

The chancellor was able to paint a better picture for the future of the British economy. Given the strong performance of the Consumer Discretionary sector, with names such as SuperGroup, Thomas Cook and Dixons all gaining, it seems his confidence was justified.

Looking briefly at the losers, it was the materials sector that was hit hardest. This sector contains the miners, an area almost entirely separate from the British domestic economy. Names like Kazakhmys, Polymetal and Antofagasta all dropped for reasons unrelated to the Chancellor’s performance.

How will Osborne affect markets this year?

This underscores an important point; Britain is not immune from the global economy, and the chancellor cannot boost growth in emerging markets or the eurozone; but he can influence certain areas in the UK. As we look ahead, much of the Budget has, as usual, been flagged up already. But supportive words could help enliven those parts of the FTSE 350 that focus on the UK economy, and so we are looking to homebuilding (and related companies), retail and pub companies for the immediate post-Budget reaction.

Denna information har sammanställts av IG, ett handelsnamn för IG Markets Limited. Utöver friskrivningen nedan innehåller materialet på denna sida inte ett fastställande av våra handelspriser, eller ett erbjudande om en transaktion i ett finansiellt instrument. IG accepterar inget ansvar för eventuella åtgärder som görs eller inte görs baserat på detta material eller för de följder detta kan få. Inga garantier ges för riktigheten eller fullständigheten av denna information. Någon person som agerar på informationen gör det således på egen risk. Materialet tar inte hänsyn till specifika placeringsmål, ekonomiska situationer och behov av någon specifik person som får ta del av detta. Det har inte upprättats i enlighet med rättsliga krav som ställs för att främja oberoende investeringsanalyser utan skall betraktas som marknadsföringsmaterial.