Denne informasjonen er utarbeidet av IG, forretningsnavnet til IG Markets Limited. I tillegg til disclaimeren nedenfor, inneholder ikke denne siden oversikt over kurser, eller tilbud om, eller oppfordring til, en transaksjon i noe finansielt instrument. IG påtar seg intet ansvar for handlinger basert på disse kommentarene og for eventuelle konsekvenser som et resultat av dette. Ingen garanti gis for nøyaktigheten eller fullstendigheten av denne informasjonen. Personer som handler ut i fra denne informasjonen gjør det på egen risiko. Forskning gitt her tar ikke hensyn til spesifikke investeringsmål, finansiell situasjon og behov som angår den enkelte person som mottar dette. Denne informasjonen er ikke utarbeidet i samsvar med regelverket for investeringsanalyser, så derfor er denne informasjonen ansett å være markedsføringsmateriale. Selv om vi ikke er hindret i å handle i forkant av våre anbefalinger, ønsker vi ikke å dra nytte av dem før de blir levert til våre kunder. Se fullstendig disclaimer og kvartalsvis oppsummering.
The reading came in at 48.3 which was well below expectations of a flat 49.5. This was a seven-month low for this reading and the employment sub-index came in at 46.9, its lowest level since February 2009. New orders and production fell sharply, while new export orders were marginally higher. This move deeper into contractionary territory is not what the market wanted to see at a time when sentiment is growing increasingly fragile.
We had already seen sentiment come off in US trade on the back of disappointing economic data and the Fed minutes. Unless there is a significant shift in conditions, the Fed is likely to continue tapering at a pace of $10 billion a month. A key discussion was around the unemployment rate approaching the 6.5% threshold and what this means for rates. With the unemployment rate falling to 6.6%, this really puts the notion that rates will not be raised until at least 2015 into question. As a result the FOMC is preparing to amend its forward guidance on when it might begin to raise rates.
With members split between providing quantitative or qualitative guidance, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a switch to a mix of the two. It is hard to see rates being raised while inflation remains well below target. It’s worth bearing in mind that the Fed funds future is still only pricing in 59 basis points of hikes from the Fed by December 2015, which is sixteen basis points below the Fed’s own consensus.
Equities struggling in Asia
Regional equities are feeling the pressure from the disappointing China data along with a miss on the Japan front as well. The ASX 200 reversed sharply from a healthy gain while the Nikkei, Hang Seng and Shanghai Composite are all trading lower. Japan’s trade balance came in wider than expected, with a sharp drop in exports, while imports rose. This was quite surprising given the weaker yen would have been expected to underpin exports. However, the weekly fund flows data showed a positive swing in Japan buying foreign bonds and stocks, while foreign buying of Japan bonds and stocks dropped.
Aussie dollar sold off
AUD/USD was perhaps the biggest hit on the back of the China data, plunging through 0.90 which had held over the past couple of sessions. The pair dropped to a low of 0.8947 where it has since found some stability but still looks incredibly vulnerable. After failing at the January highs in the 0.908 region twice this week, a near-term reversal now seems to be in play. Near-term support is likely to be in the 0.89 region. There is nothing on the Australian economic calendar for the rest of the week to look out for and therefore focus will shift to the USD side of the equation.
On the US economic calendar we have CPI, unemployment claims and flash manufacturing PMI data due out along with the Philly Fed manufacturing index which will give a bit more insight into the weather impact. On the CPI front the market is looking for a 0.1% rise; any upside risk to this will only support the USD further and potentially weigh on risk. Meanwhile comments by Fed members remain mixed, with James Bullard saying he’d favour dropping explicit thresholds and reverting back to just looking at data.