The oil trade

Intraday market volatility (VIX) remains a big part of my current trading strategy – the snap back in US markets, risk and the oil price is something that feeds into my base case for 2016.

Source: Bloomberg

VIX base case

Here are the scenarios of note:

Bull case in 2016: VIX in upper 20s-30s

  • US markets re-base: hyper-inflation from the seven-year bull market brought on by the Fed’s QE programs filters out, leading to a sharp equity selloff.
  • Manufacturing and industrial productions prints remain in contraction or at decade lows.
  • Employment starts to feel the squeeze and slows.
  • CNY ‘surprises’ the markets with a sharp devaluation.

Bear case in 2016: VIX back in high (even low) teens

  • Improvement in US earnings - breaking the three quarters of negative earnings growth will help stability.
  • Improving ISM numbers in the US – manufacturing out of contraction.
  • China showing signs of stability and increases demand for global imports.
  • CNY NOT ‘surprising’ the markets with a sharp devaluation

In short – My view is the VIX will average above the yearly average of 17.3 (past 25 years) in 2016.

What drives this call will vary over the year – however, it is currently fear driving the oil markets.


The oil trade

I have been particularly keen on trading Brent over the past eight weeks. The macroeconomics of oil are very compelling for those with a short-term view. Again, forming a solid base about the top-down views has made the short call in Brent the correct one.

These include:

  • Geo-political tensions and OPEC inaction (on the brink of collapse in my view)
  • Non-OPEC non-US producers continuing to maximise output
  • The EIA showing stockpiling at record levels
  • The onshore shale-gas trade seeing rig counts down but not collapsing
  • Chinese demand not absorbing supply



The demand/supply equation for oil is still skewed to the right and sees breakeven points putting the equilibrium price well underwater.

Be aware: A possible alteration to my macro view involves rumours that Russia and Saudi Arabia are in discussion to cut production, which was reported by the Iraqi oil minister overnight. Oil settled up 3.6% on the rumours and this is the risk to my Brent trade. However, the chart is showing several things:

RSI’s have not hit 60 since September and each bounce off the ‘oversold’ level of 20 has only seen the strength indicator moving back to ‘natural’ rather than signalling a buy with conviction trade.

The current pop suggests short covering and the moving averages are signalling that prices of US$30 or lower are a more likely scenario in the coming few weeks. The chart shows the momentum is still to the downside.

However, buying is strong at the upper end of US$26 a barrel. That buying also coincided with oil volatility hitting a record peak last week, the highest level since the OIV index was first created.

Note it is still elevated and feeds back into my macro base case around the VIX in general.


Brent trade idea

I’m looking to sell into strength up to US$35 a barrel. My reasoning? Expectations of inaction from OPEC are keeping supply at current levels and Chinese New Year is seeing demand slow to a standstill.

I see having a limit at US$27 a barrel as advantageous, as level buying will come in, plus a stop loss at $35.50 a barrel to limit the possibility of macro intervention.

I have a short view here and will reassess the trade in mid-February when China is back from New Year celebrations.


Ahead of the Australian open

The ASX looks like having a flat open. However, the oil pop overnight and the fact US markets have had two reasonable nights mean leads for the Australian session are on the up.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.