The (top) fat side

The moves in global markets and the ASX over the past six to seven trading days have led to statements such as ‘rallies are back’, ‘new market order’ and even a ‘new bull market’.


As much as I would like to agree with the positive sentiment, several key macro headwinds remain on point and the drivers of the past week are now showing signs of topping out, ie. iron ore, oil markets and US markets.

I stand by my strategy that the ASX is in a horizontal trading pattern with a ‘tubby’ and ‘squat’ profile – a historically wider trading range (tubbiness) with relatively low aggregated capital growth (squatness).

I believe two scenarios are playing out:

The first scenario

Markets (the ASX included) will collapse and become fundamentally ‘cheap’ – the six-and-a-half-year bull market only ended six months ago. The correction in January had distinct characteristics of being overvalued in the current cycle and is looking for structural weakness.

Some would argue this may have happened on 10 February with what looked like a ‘final capitulation’ trade.

However, were markets fundamentally cheap after this event? I would argue they were cheaper and the selloff from January had overextended, giving rise to a buy call. But are they fundamentally cheap? US and European markets were trading at historically fair multiples rather than what I would describe as ‘fundamentally cheap’.

The ASX’s cyclical side (resources and energy) were ‘fundamentally cheap’ and any moves up in oil and industrial metals (which has transpired) was going to drive a rally in this space.

I would agree that in mid-February there was a point of ‘fundamental cheapness’ in the ASX. But that price point has closed, and I am yet to see a reason for a leg to 5400 points and above.

Underlying company earnings are, if honest, underwhelming and the AUD, China and a few other factors are likely to cap the rise in the index.

The second scenario

Markets will remain volatile and trade in a directionless manner with a tubby and stout 2016 profile. Macroeconomic fundamentals, the oil price and inflation will leave markets in a state of flux.

Macroeconomists see the financial crisis as a three-pronged event, starting with US sub-prime, then a European sovereign crisis, and followed by EM devaluations and capital outflows – particularly in China.

The economic targets coming out of China’s National People’s Congress shows the country is going to work as hard as possible to stave off its hard landing fear.

The release is a medium-term positive for industrial metals and a positive for cyclical resource stocks, but it has not changed the macro fundamentals, and that has been reflected (so far) in data releases. Industrial production at 25 year lows, fixed asset investment on the slide, retail sales the same, trade balances that are becoming sporadic and inconsistent, and a sticky translation to a ‘consumption nation’.

In short, my strategy for the ASX is that trading a ‘tubby’ and ‘stout’ is likely to continue. We see several signs that involve the markets moving back towards the mean level of the past six months. The range trade is intact and it is likely to move off the current highs today.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.