Risk sentiment slumps on China data

Risk turned sour in Asia as investors reacted to the disappointing China HSBC manufacturing PMI reading for February. 

The reading came in at 48.3 which was well below expectations of a flat 49.5. This was a seven-month low for this reading and the employment sub-index came in at 46.9, its lowest level since February 2009. New orders and production fell sharply, while new export orders were marginally higher. This move deeper into contractionary territory is not what the market wanted to see at a time when sentiment is growing increasingly fragile.

We had already seen sentiment come off in US trade on the back of disappointing economic data and the Fed minutes. Unless there is a significant shift in conditions, the Fed is likely to continue tapering at a pace of $10 billion a month. A key discussion was around the unemployment rate approaching the 6.5% threshold and what this means for rates. With the unemployment rate falling to 6.6%, this really puts the notion that rates will not be raised until at least 2015 into question. As a result the FOMC is preparing to amend its forward guidance on when it might begin to raise rates.

With members split between providing quantitative or qualitative guidance, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a switch to a mix of the two. It is hard to see rates being raised while inflation remains well below target. It’s worth bearing in mind that the Fed funds future is still only pricing in 59 basis points of hikes from the Fed by December 2015, which is sixteen basis points below the Fed’s own consensus.

Equities struggling in Asia

Regional equities are feeling the pressure from the disappointing China data along with a miss on the Japan front as well. The ASX 200 reversed sharply from a healthy gain while the Nikkei, Hang Seng and Shanghai Composite are all trading lower. Japan’s trade balance came in wider than expected, with a sharp drop in exports, while imports rose. This was quite surprising given the weaker yen would have been expected to underpin exports. However, the weekly fund flows data showed a positive swing in Japan buying foreign bonds and stocks, while foreign buying of Japan bonds and stocks dropped.

Aussie dollar sold off

AUD/USD was perhaps the biggest hit on the back of the China data, plunging through 0.90 which had held over the past couple of sessions. The pair dropped to a low of 0.8947 where it has since found some stability but still looks incredibly vulnerable. After failing at the January highs in the 0.908 region twice this week, a near-term reversal now seems to be in play. Near-term support is likely to be in the 0.89 region. There is nothing on the Australian economic calendar for the rest of the week to look out for and therefore focus will shift to the USD side of the equation.

On the US economic calendar we have CPI, unemployment claims and flash manufacturing PMI data due out along with the Philly Fed manufacturing index which will give a bit more insight into the weather impact. On the CPI front the market is looking for a 0.1% rise; any upside risk to this will only support the USD further and potentially weigh on risk. Meanwhile comments by Fed members remain mixed, with James Bullard saying he’d favour dropping explicit thresholds and reverting back to just looking at data.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.