China growth met with scepticism

Earnings from the US continue to follow the trend of disappointing top line numbers saved by cost cutting, which is seeing the earnings per share (EPS) line just beating estimates.

Source: Bloomberg

On the current course, the US will see its worst quarterly reporting season in four years, however 70% of companies on the S&P that have already reported are beating estimates on the EPS line.

China’s GDP – strangely, ANZ managed to forecast China’s GDP was going to be 50 basis points worse than the reported actuals but the 6.9% has been met with a high level of scepticism. There’s no escaping the fact it’s the lowest read since the first quarter in 2009. The formula for GDP is: consumption + investment (private) + government + (exports – imports). The G in that equation registered near enough to a 27% increase year-on-year and is clearly propping up growth. This also illustrates stimulus is happening. Here is the figure we are concentrating on, nominal GDP was 6.2% once you apply the 0.7% deflator – a sign that China is slowing fast.

A second part of the China data that may have been missed in all the hype around the GDP read is that industrial production (IP) fell to 5.7% from 6.1%, with estimates being 6.0%. In March, IP registered its lowest read in 25 years at 5.6%. Yesterday’s IP supports President Xi Jinping comments from the weekend that the ‘sluggish world economy is weighing on China’s growth’. The commodities complex was not impressed with the China data – all major industrial metals on the London Metal Exchange (LME) fell between 0.7% to 2.8%. Aluminium, an OPEX metal, was the worst performer.

Morgan Stanley (MS) currently holds the wooden spoon for the worse report of the season. MS reported an EPS line that was 20 cents below consensus with top line numbers that were just as horrible. Like Goldman Sachs, MS’ bond trading was down, however the major reason for these figures is its private investments into China which saw mass write-downs.

RBA minutes come out today. The interbank market continues to flip-flop around the 3 November meeting, spiking to 39% yesterday, and sliding back to 33% after the China GDP figures. December slid back to be a sub 50% chance. On the other hand, now over 60% of economists see a 25 basis point cut on Melbourne Cup day. The number of economists that see two cuts by May 2016 has risen past 50% for the first time.

The AUD’s reaction to the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) divergence views and the China GDP figures is reflected in the last 24 hours of trading, coming a full circle in price. It spiked on China figures and then grinded higher still as the interbank market followed suit. When economists and analysts reports hit the Street, the AUD came crashing back down to the level it started at. The Melbourne Cup is a live event and the market is currently placing an each-way bet.

Bit of a directionless open this morning. We are calling the ASX down four points to 5266. Iron ore was down slightly and oil lost further ground, yet US futures have shifted higher. We would currently expect a relatively quiet session.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.