Checking the couch for every coin

The Financial Stability Report (FSR) has done nothing to dampen expectations of a May rate cut; in fact, it has actually caused the probability to increase.

Source: Bloomberg

Expectations of a 25 basis-point rate cut in May reached 104.2% at the close of business last night. April is now pricing in a 57.5% chance of a cut.

Interestingly, the market is now pricing in a 57% chance that the cash rate will be at 1.75% come May (a 50bp cut) – will this provide further support for the equity market?

That is an interesting situation the market is pricing in - the FSR argued that it is becoming increasingly concerned speculative property purchases are rising. It singled out the commercial sector as a particular worry considering the risk attached to tenancies in a slowing economy. The fact tenancy yields may not warrant the current investment could lead to increased selling if rates of returns are not met.

The report also stated that it was monitoring bank lending and had seen an ‘increase in loan competition’ of late. Although standards hadn’t declined, it believed further monitoring is needed as the new APRA rules released in November needed further time to filter through.

There are mixed messages from the FSR, however. Nothing in the report suggested the ‘concerns’ were becoming ‘overheated’. This explains why the interbank market moved higher as monetary policy is still needed to support the non-mining sector.

And, despite the concerns around mass expansion in the banking, telecommunication and healthcare spaces, we continue to see bidding on any dips as the cash rate is heading lower.

Timing the exit

The changing landscape of the yield trade is presenting a real challenge as yield compression continues almost unabated, even with the US Federal Reserve signalling that the rate hike cycle is edging closer. However, the dovish outlook from the Fed illustrates the difficulty in exiting the unconventional yield trade.

The other issue the yield trade has created is altered board behaviour as they scramble to give the market what it wants. The biggest losers of the yield trade have been the cyclical and growth plays of old - plays that benefited from commodity moves or innovation in niche areas.

The issue for these firms is the market is no longer willing to risk capital for longer-term growth opportunities. This has forced firms to pay out cash to attract investment.

This statistic clearly illustrates the effect the yield trade has had on non-financial plays:

From FY10 to the end of FY14, ASX 200 non-financial firms generated A$128 billion in free cash flow. Over the same period, the non-financial space has given back A$177 billion.

That means that for every dollar returned to shareholders over the past four years, companies have had to generate 1.4 time in cash. Going deeper into the sectors – materials have paid out 1.6 times free cash flow, industrials have being paying out 1.2 times free cash. Over 50% of firms have returned more cash than they have generated. And this was during a time when these plays have been undergoing huge cost cutting and capex reduction programs.

This model is unsustainable. The probability of meeting forecasted dividends as EPS growth falls will not be sufficient to meet these targets in the current conditions as cost cutting measures now look fully implemented.

I am not advocating a rush to the exit or even an exit in the immediate future. I am, however, looking at a very slow drip out of this trade – I think navigating the overvalued yield trade will be a disorderly affair when it unwinds. 

Ahead of the Australian open

We saw a fairly volatile night in the US, where the S&P and DOW both lost over 1% and the NASDAQ had its worst night in five months falling 2.4%. The futures market is looking a little bleak.

We are calling the market down 31 points to 5942. It is likely to be the banks that will feel the sell-off, considering RIO in London has had a fairly positive night. There is no major Asian macro news today, meaning the market is likely to react to the US futures and whether Wall street is pointing to another weaker night.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.