Catalysts for change: part two – earnings growth

It’s going to be a busy month with US earnings season beginning next week, and in earnest the week after, the Australian bank earnings season will be three weeks away.

This is why earnings are my second catalyst for change.

Earnings per share says it all

  • Overlaying a chart of the S&P versus earnings per share (EPS) actuals, EPS has lead the market the majority of the time barring the GFC and the height of 2007 bull market. What’s catching my attention is that EPS is in rapid decline yet the S&P has had no response to the bottom up change.
  • Of the three EPS decline cycles in the modern era (1991, 2000 and 2008), EPS has lead the S&P on average by two and half quarters. Currently EPS and the S&P are at parity. If in the coming earnings season EPS crosses below the S&P, it will be the first time since 2008 this has happened and it will also be the first time since 2008 that there has been four quarters of negative earnings growth.
  • Earnings expectations for 2016 in the US doesn’t paint a rosy picture either, with both the first and second quarters expected to decline. This would suggest 2015/16 could be worse than the slowdown in 1991, on par with the bubble in 2000 and may even surpass this with a third quarter of declines at the end of the year.
  • In Australia EPS growth has been stuck in a state of flux since 2004 – it was fluctuating even at the back end of the mining boom in 2006 and 2007. However, it has largely been ignored, as the ASX tends to concentrate on bottom line growth in net profit; the catch here is over the past four financial years NPAT growth has been down to capex refinements rather than sustained earnings expansion which is unsustainable.
  • The banks are one of the clearest examples of this. Cash earnings have been positively impacted by the housing-led recovery since 2013 but it has also been down to bad and doubtful debt provisioning hitting record lows, employment freezes and cost out in non-core banking, which is coming to an end. Market pricing in the banks over the past month illustrates that the market believes the mid-single digit cash earnings expansion over the past three to four years is coming to end.

Why earnings are a catalyst is because under normal periods of EPS declines, government and central banks would step in to stimulate the economy and moderate the slowdowns. This time around, central banks are at the end of their existing stimulus programs.

The US has only avoided recessions in the past 75 years when US earnings have declined by two quarters or more, due to the Fed stepping in with stimulus. What happens now if the cupboard is bare?

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

Find articles by analysts

Een artikel zoeken

Form has failed to submit. Please contact IG directly.

  • Ik wens per e-mail informatie van IG Group bedrijven te ontvangen over handelsideeën en IG's producten en diensten.

Voor meer informatie over hoe wij uw gegevens mogelijk kunnen gebruiken, bekijkt u ons Privacy- en toegangsbeleid en onze privacy website.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.