No double dip, Britain rejoices

News came through today that, far from enduring a double-dip recession (ie two separate recessions separated by only a short period of growth), Britain managed to avoid a contraction in GDP during the late 2011/early 2012 period.

The ONS has published significant revisions to its historic data, showing that the UK economy was not as weak as previously thought. However, there is a downside: living standards fell by the largest amount in a generation at the beginning of this year. Real disposable income was down 1.7% in the first quarter of 2013, a drop not seen since 1987, as wages fell in real terms and prices rose.

Hold the celebrations

Before everyone uncorks the champagne, the news means that the actual recession post-2008 was in fact deeper than previously thought. The current government will be delighted that there was no recession under its leadership, and that the recession under Labour was worse than had been stated, but it can take little comfort from the gloomy vista presented by consumer spending.

This provides an interesting commentary on the state of the UK economy: the overall picture might not be apocalyptic, but with consumer spending so heavily depressed we are unlikely to see a major recovery in the near term, or even over the next few years. Wage growth is almost non-existent, but inflation remains above the Bank of England’s target rate.

There’s still work to be done

The spending review shows that the government is making steady, if modest, progress on deficit reduction, but so far we have failed to get to the heart of the UK’s problems. A new Bank of England governor might inspire some hope, but Mr Carney can only have a minimal impact on consumer spending.

Those hoping for a strong bounce in the UK economy will be sorely disappointed. Today’s GDP data might give a small positive boost, but the long-term view is much dimmer. We are a long way from being out of the woods. 

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.