Trader thoughts - the long and short of it

We round out 2017 today on a flat note, with Aussie SPI futures lower by 9 points, and our ASX 200 calling sitting at 6075, with US equity indices predictably little changed on the day.

bg_us stocks new 2
Source: Bloomberg

Clearly, today is one where we can turn the page on the year that was and continue reflecting on the dynamics ahead.

If we see over $2.5 billion in turnover I would be very surprised and from 11:30 AEDT it seems likely the market will drift into the close, but we will take a 7% year-to-date index return (13% on a total return basis), certainly given where expectations for index returns where at the start of the year.

Aussie tech and Healthcare have been the two sectors which have driven the outperformance for the full-year of 2017, but energy and materials have outperformed over a three-, 1-month and 5-day period and this momentum factor suggests that investors and traders are happy to hold these names going into 2018. Certainly, BHP trading at the highest levels since May 2015 and eyeing a break through $30 in January, has helped the ASX 200 materials sector to push to the highest levels since early 2012 and the sector has almost doubled since January 2016.

Leads today for the materials space are somewhat constructive for today open, with copper leading the way again and pushing through $3.30, with a gain of 0.7%. What a run we have seen since 6 December, with price moving from $2.95, but it has almost been a perfect storm for price appreciation, although we can the likes of aluminum also have seen strong moves too. Global growth is undeniably strong, while China have pushed its biggest copper producer to temporarily halt production for environmental issues and China’s November copper import statistics were highly impressive too. I like to assess the power behind the underlying trend by how price reacts to moves into the 5-day EMA (exponential moving average), and as one can see on the daily chart, price has traded into, but held and closed above this short-term average everyday since 12 December. So I am happy to stay bullish on this metal given the trend in play and hold this view until price subsequently closes below the 5-day EMA and this same trading stance can be applied to aluminum too.

Outside of industrial metals and iron ore futures have seen a strong gain, while gold is up some 0.5% and looks bullish here, where a test of $1300 looks achievable soon, despite the extended run of form. The combination of a weaker USD at a time rising US inflation expectations seen in the bond market (i.e. US 10-year ‘breakevens’) has to be seen as a positive combination for golds and wider precious metals.

The ASX 200 energy sector is up some 20% year-to-date and sitting at the highest levels since 2015 and one suspects we should see the sector round out the year following the form seen in the S&P 500 energy sector, which is up 0.03% at the time of writing. The moves in the ASX 200 energy sector this year won’t shock too greatly given the bullish moves in the barrel since late June, although we are going to need to find some inspiration from somewhere to push the US crude through $60 and to form a new range of $60 to $65. Aside from pipeline explosions and Saudi budget expectations, oil traders have seen the release of the weekly Department of Energy (DoE) inventory data, with total crude inventories falling 4.6 million barrels (vs 3.8% eyed by the consensus). However, we saw a small build in gasoline inventories of 591,000, which was below the 1.29 million expected, while this was partially offset by a chunky build of 1.09 million barrels in distillates.

By way of news flow through the session and in Europe it has been confirmed that 4 March will be the date of the Italian election, so a date that many will look forward to as a potential volatility event. There has been no negative reaction in European asset and why should they? This date had been talked about for a while and to be fair the markets has been more enthused to sell USDs, which has taken EUR/USD into $1.1950 and into the 27 November supply of $1.1962, with USD/JPY through the 113 handle. It’s hard to recall a time when FX forecaster had a view that every G10 currency will gain against the USD in the year-ahead but that is where we are. So the idea of bubbling inflation in the US financial system and a central bank that may actually need to hike three, maybe even four times at a time when interest rate market are priced for two hikes is being outmatched by relative monetary policy changes in other G10 central banks and of course relative differences in trade, the current account and the broader fiscal position. There seems little doubt that current account dynamics are supporting the AUD right now, although we couldn’t see AUD/USD hold above 78c overnight, despite hitting a session high of $0.7809. Like copper, watch the 5-day EMA as a guide for trend in AUD/USD and stay long until price closes below here.

Outside of European news and we have seen a second tier data releases in the form of weekly jobless claims (245,000 vs 240,000 expected) and the November trade deficit of advanced goods at $69.7 billion (vs $68.1 billion in the prior read). Certainly the trade data is a mild USD negative, although this is offset by a 0.7% gain in wholesale inventories (vs 0.3% for the consensus read), with slight revisions higher in the prior read and this should partially offset the trade data, where inventories could support the Q4 GDP print. A slight move higher on the day currently seen in the US Treasury market, with yields across the curve modestly higher, with the US 10-year Treasury (by way of guide) currently 2.43%.

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.