It’s one thing after another for RBS

US regulators have imposed a fine of $100 million on the beleaguered bank.

Yesterday saw the news that Nathan Bostock, the CFO of Royal Bank of Scotland, had resigned after just three months in the job and jumped ship to join Santander’s UK arm. This came roughly six months after the resignation of Stephen Hester, who was replaced by Ross McEwan as CEO. While it’s a good idea to keep boardroom thinking fresh, this sort of turnover in managerial staff is taking things a little too far.

RBS is still predominantly owned by the UK taxpayer and overseen by the government. This in itself must cause issues, but with the government’s overriding desire to re-float the company hanging over it, these boardroom reshuffles are rather worrying.

Yesterday, after the UK markets had closed, US regulators announced they had fined RBS $100 million for its failure to suitably oversee cash transactions with sanctioned countries such as Iran, Sudan, Burma and Cuba. This $100 million fine joins the list, as the bank has also been fined €391 million for its part in the Libor-rigging scandal. Of course, RBS has also set aside more than £2.6 billion over the last couple of years for the mis-selling of PPI. With Lloyds Banking Group also being fined £28 million for its poor management of sales teams’ bonus schemes yesterday, one wonders how long it will be before similar fines appear for other banks.

With all that said, now that all the skeletons have hopefully been cleared out of RBS’s cupboard, the bank does make a more attractive proposition when the government decides to push for floatation. As my colleague David Madden stated yesterday, RBS does appear to have many fundamentally strong assets and feels a little oversold at these levels.  

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.