Another managerial shake-up at G4S

To lose one CEO is unfortunate, but to lose two in less than a year looks careless.

Yesterday, after the markets had closed, G4S announced that its UK CEO Richard Morris had resigned. As he had been in the job for less than a year, this does raise some serious questions.

The G4S board has been less than impressive in its performance, going all the way back to the firm’s mishandled security coverage of the London 2012 Olympics. Only through the intervention of the government and the assistance of the UK military was a major calamity avoided. This debacle saw previous CEO David Taylor-Smith leave the firm, to be replaced by Mr Morris.

The next embarrassment to impact the firm was the discovery that its main rival, Serco, had been charging the government for security-tagging criminals who were already in prison or dead. Others had not even been tagged. The government’s consequent lack of trust for the two companies prompted it to launch an investigation by the Serious Fraud Squad. As the government is G4S’s largest customer, a frosty relationship will not help.

The new man taking the helm should know what he is getting himself into, as he is the current COO Eddie Ashton. A promotion from within should ensure limited disruption to the running of the firm, but I can’t help wondering if some fresh impetus from an outsider might not have been a better idea. Time will obviously tell.

G4S chart

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen. 79% van de retailbeleggers lijdt verlies op de handel in CFD’s met deze aanbieder.
Het is belangrijk dat u goed begrijpt hoe CFD's werken en dat u nagaat of u zich het hoge risico op verlies kunt permitteren.
CFD’s zijn complexe instrumenten en brengen vanwege het hefboomeffect een hoog risico mee van snel oplopende verliezen.